Way Things Ought To Be (Rush Limbaugh)
Approval Rate: 38%
Reviews 16
by rozandi
Wed Jul 28 2004This guy is a cancer to a country trying to heal itself. He offers nothing except keeping people angry with dis-information and his ditto-heads swallow it whole. How sad that people listen to this Sh_t stirrer.
by enkidu
Sun Jan 25 2004Sewage in print. Lies, distortions, rantings of an egotistical gasbag who is too cowardly to debate a live human being--since he cuts off anyone who disagrees with him articulately. His fans worship him unthinkingly--this hypocritical demagogue could take pictures of his bowel movements and right wingers would buy them.
by irishgit
Sun Jan 25 2004If things were the way they ought to be, this kind of ignorant, barely literate crap would never see a bookstores shelves. The fact that his fans appear to have less intellectual development than a silverback gorilla must account for the fact he sold any copies. Funny, I wouldn't have thought it had enough pictures for them.
by dav99657
Wed Oct 29 2003An ironic book, in ways not intended.
by ladyshark4534
Wed Oct 29 2003Sometimes people are way too far right and left that they give such a rotten name to the Political Spectrum. Now seriously, Why can't we have balanced politicians instead of screaming members like Rush Limbaugh and Michael Moore? Wouldn't it be better if we became a little less biased?
by president_x_d
Wed Oct 01 2003Some moron said in his "review" of this book that Rush is "too cowardly to debate a live human being". Huh? He's had a politically oriented radio show for almost 20 years (counting his local Sacramento career) and debates with naysayers every day of the year. Like him or not, I've heard plenty of callers take issue with him LIVE on the show. In any case, this book is wonderfully funny and is loaded with common sense truths for those of us who tire of the doom & gloom liberal mantra. The book is dated now since it was published in the early 90s but is still worth reading.
by csu91339
Tue Sep 30 2003Horrible. A child could see through the lies & half-truths.
by solenoid_dh
Wed Sep 24 2003I thought I had rated this long ago but apparently not. In any case, just read what Errol had to say about it. I agree totally...It was really good, but his second book, "See, I Told You So" was better. And really, it should only be rated on here by people who have read it. After all, I didn't write anything about Hillary's book until I went through it myself.
by anmalone
Fri Mar 07 2003A classic of good common sense polemics.
by gopman79
Sun Jan 05 2003That says it, 3 of 4 people who noted this book a 1 called Rush a name. When liberals are backed into a corner, this is ALL they can do!
by shukhevych
Wed Oct 30 2002don't always agree with him, but excellent orator.
by brt800
Fri Sep 13 2002You are soooo jealous it's pathetic.
by thefreak
Sun Mar 24 2002Don't waste your money - it will probably all go to him, because this man is a liar and a crook, as evidenced by his book. Poorly written, chock full of fake facts, and by God, where does this idiot get off? I distinxtly remember a passage in the book that clearly voiced his belief that the sole purpose of women is to have children for and take care of their husbands. Well, I'm sorry Rush, but this is notm the 18th century anymore, and as a girl I do not put up with that kind of crap. I may be female, but at least I have a mind of my own, even if this living propaganda poster doesn't want me to. Also, if any of you have read the part of the book about homosexuality, what facts, what scientific reasoning does he use to PROVE that homosexuality is a choice or is evil? None. He uses a four-line passage from a bookwritten a thousand years ago that has been interpreted in countless ways. Not worth reading. I will listen to these homophobes when they come up with a NEW argument that... Read more
by errol4e1
Fri Feb 15 2002This one was good but I think his second book is even better. I wonder how many of the people that give low ratings to his book have actually even read it. From the lack of substance in their comments I think most of them haven't but they just hate Rush. I don't rate any books on this site that I haven't read. That would be immature and shows no class.
by rustyfe0
Wed Oct 17 2001Well, Rush is right. But then, he's always right. I found this book to be very entertaining but selectively educating and hopelessly biased. Make no mistake, he's a very erudite, entertaining fellow, but how can anyone take him so seriously? Even he has said that he is an entertainer who happens to be a conservative. We all know Rush never went to college, but that's neither here nor there. I remain happily committed to my liberal-socialist roots while maintaining a healthy skepticism of everything that comes out of this blowhard's mouth.
by erick316
Thu Sep 06 2001You people are full of crap.