Sue Herrera

I've watched Sue since she was on the Financial News Network years ago. I thought she was beautiful back then and more so now. As to her hair I've loved every style she's worn. As to her weight I happen to love heavy women so I'm biased but you would have to be crazy to not think she has a beautiful face.

I love Sue. She is great. Yes, she is a bit overweight, most of us in America are. So what? She is good at what she does. That is all that should matter. I remember her from 20 years ago and she was a major babe then. As far as I am concerned she still is.

sue herrera is great. she is the reason i watch cnbc.

I'm not a Sue Herrera fan, but I do watch CNBC when she is on. I don't think she has much to contribute and she makes some ridiculous comments that annoy the crap out of me. Also she's overweight and it reminds me that I'm overweight too and probably about her same age. Boo f-ing whoo.

The great thing about "BBW's" is that they always have a great personality. Sue Herrera manages to dispel this myth in one fell fat swoop. Not a show goes by where I look up from my pc's and say "Wow, what a bitch!!!" With the slew of intelligent honies on this show, how does she manage to stay employed on the network?

Easily the weakest link of CNBC on air talent. Biggest career asset is her "big asset"...owns the full figured anchor niche, any move to replace her leaves the network open to possible discrimination claim.

SUE HAS NO.O.O. CREDIBILITY AND ASKS THE DUMBEST QUESTIONS. SHE HAS OUTIVED HER USEFULLNESS AND HAS GOT TO GO

SUE HERRERA BUGS THE SHI*** OUT OF ME. I DO NOT WATCH CNBC DURING THE HOURS SHE'S ON. SHE REMINDS ME OF AN ALOOF HOUSEWIFE FROM THE SUBERBS, OBBIOUSLY THE MARKET SHE IS ADDRESSING. I CAN'T REMEMBER THE LAST TIME I DISLIKED SOMEONE ON TV MORE. SHE MAY BE ABLE TO READ HER PROMPTER BUT SHE KNOWS NO MORE ABOUT FINANCES THAN THE MAN ON THE MOON. GOSH SHE BUGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sue Hererra is an excellent journalist, informative, insightful and incisive....and she is a MAJOR BABE!

I have always wondered if Sue Herrera is either the wife or daughter of some high ranking guy in CNBC or GE? Otherwise, I just don't see how she has been able to keep her position on a primetime business show. She never shows any confidence in any of the things she says, alway saying either "I think blah blah blah", or "blah blah blah I think"....never seeming to know whether what she is saying is correct or not? This after 25 years of self-professed experience? She should just stay home and be a mother and leave the business reporting to someone more capable. I just don't get how she keeps her job! (like I say, gotta be the wife or daughter of someone in charge)

I think that Sue Herrera does a great job! She is well-spoken, very knowlegable, and attractive. Why would anyone spend time writing a review of Sue's body or hairstyle? Who are these critics, anyway? The fashion police? The body police? The hair Nazis? Do they only want to look at runway models? Is a real woman offensive to them? I'll bet that the critics have perfect bodies, themselves. Also, they probably know exactly what its like to be on camera before an audience of millions, and manage to get it right all of the time. question to Sue's critics.....Could YOU do her job? If so, why are you not on TV? You are pathetic.

0 ZERO, NEGATIVE. Sue is a fantastically fat, unintelligent pig. If she would lose 50 pounds, gain intelligence (likely impossible) and avoid ("if I could start with you") phraseology; Is she expecting a guest to object????), then and only then, she has a chance to avoid removal and she might be retained on television or another media outlet as a fat clown.

sue is a big beautiful woman and i'd love to see her do a plus size lingerie modeling spread.

I have always admired Sue Herrera on her integrity and professionalism on CNBC News. I must say that today she looks better than ever. When once she hid behind her pouffy hairstyle, she now has a softer and less pouffy look, and she shows me that she is not only beautiful but has taken control of herself and I admire her softer look. She is beautiful, soft, and the connsumate professional and I am glad that she has done more to look wonderful, soft, feminine and forever the confident professional. I am so happy for her that she has finally taken care of herself...after all, if a person doesn't think of nunber one, who will? Hats off to her in looing better than ever and always being so very professional. She makes me always want to strive for excellence...I am proud to watch her today and so are many other women who have taken control of their lives instead of their lives controlling them. I don't know what the rating system is, but I see 7 ratings. I now rate her a 6.5 on my sc... Read more

maninblack, i can assure you that yours is a solitary opinion. Sue is a professional. She is informative and asks insightful questions in interviews that reveal the subject at hand in fresh prespectives. Anyone can watch her show and gain somethinig, regardless of their market smarts. Most of all though, she is a comfort to see on the screen, calm, thoughtful, poised, and yes, hot hot hot. just the curl of her lip sends shivers.

She is the sexyest woman Wall Street. I auctualy made my wife have cosmetic surgery to look like her, we are still working on the weight gain, another 50 pounds to go! wahoo!.

Sue Herrera has always been a charming, low-key, informed financial analyst. Of late, she has undergone a physical transformation, making her even more physically appealing. I am tempted to jump through the screen and hug her. I only wish she would jump to FOX News, which I watch more often.

I'm baffled by the comments of another reviewer. Herrera strikes me as being both knowledgeable and thoughtful with her interviews and appears to be reasoned and non-inflammatory in her reporting. I hope she stays with CNBC for a long time.

It's now 2005, and in catching business news at noon, I'm forced to watch Herrera. The woman's a smug cowwho has a very bizarre oncamera manner: simpleminded and with very shallow expertise. Is this the same anchor the 03 reviewer speaks of? Perhaps that reviewer from 2003 has not kept up with her jousting with her hair style; this fetish has now become a challenge with mascara. Her journalism in travelling to Russia, and to China was sophomoric and used a ping-pong presentation style that was incredibly tiring to watch. I've asked Hoffman, the new CNBC president, Why is she still on air? but am still awaiting a reply. Is there a -1 rating?

One of the smartest, prettiest Tv personalities with a great sense of humor!!