Paul McCartney (bass for The Beatles)
Approval Rate: 92%
Reviews 7
by dudley07726
Mon Apr 02 2007He is a great singer. One of the best. A few years ago, a Brit mag (Q- I think) rated the top vocalists of all time. He came in 3rd after lennon (2) and Aretha (1). Macca can sing any style- ballad or rock. Hey PSILU, wake up.
by birse244
Thu May 11 2006I find his music a bit hit and miss but I do like his voice.
by psilub66
Sun May 07 2006Include him in the group as a bassist and songwriter/co-writer but not as a vocalist. I love Paul and his material and style but there are far, far better British vocalists.
by cmr385ss
Mon Dec 19 2005Paul is the ULTIMATE bass-player for many reasons. First and foremost is his conception, writing, and playing many of the most-influential Rock bass-lines of all-time. His playing is nothing short of superb and "perfect for the moment" in every Beatle song ever released. His playing was also extremely innovative and technically challenging when it needed to be. He is probably most responsible for making the bass an instrument that every one suddenly wanted to play, rather than run away from. His body of work also proves that bass-players do not always have to play "chops," unless it's called for (e.g. "Hey Bulldog"). If you are looking for perfection in a bass-player, you'll find it in Paul McCartney.
by imagine1921
Fri Aug 06 2004axlrod you r sooo ingnorant. who do you like, brtinety spears?
by jamestkirk
Wed May 26 2004Talk about your ignorance.....Paul McCartney (along with John Lennon) wrote the songs that the greatest ever band performed. They were innovators. He is considered by many to be the greatest songwriter in rock history. Anything less than five is an unawareness of your rock history.
by garjen55
Tue May 25 2004The obvious choice for the UK Supergroup bass player - of course, anyone in The Beatles could have been in a Supergroup.