Making Progress in the War on Terror

Approval Rate: 0%

Reviews 9

Sort by:
  • by

    abichara

    Tue Jun 30 2009

    The biggest strategic error that we made in Iraq at the beginning of the occupation was disbanding the civil service and the military. When we did that, their entire civil society collapsed, creating a situation where terrorist organizations like al-Qaeda could move in and thrive. Had we kept Iraq's institutions in place, the war would have certainly turned out much differently. The situation would have been stabilized much more quickly and civil war MIGHT have been averted, although there's no telling how the political situation would have played out The arrival of the terrorist groups into Iraq back in 2004 created extra violence. The terrorists, regarded as foreign fighters by many, started to pit the Shia's against the Sunni's by perpetuating terrorist attacks in Shia territories. The tide started turning against al-Qaeda in Iraq only after the United States directly began to bribe Sunni leaders into fighting and getting rid of these groups. The "surge" did contribute some... Read more

  • by

    ladyjesusfan77_7

    Sat Jan 27 2007

    I think all this war has managed to do is cause nothing but sadness and heartbreak, and it all could have been avoided.

  • by

    classictvfan47

    Wed Jan 18 2006

    Terror comes in many shapes and forms, and Saddam Hussein was, without a doubt, a true terrorist. Rape rooms are certaintly a terror. Mass graves are certaintly a terror. Repressing women to the status of livestock is also terribly outdated. And, of course, if you refer to the evil villains like Al Qaeda, Saddam Hussein supported them to. Time after time, Hussein supported actions against American interests both in the Middle East and abroad. And, time after time, he looked the other way as his so-called brothers, attacked the property and citizens of free, democratic nations--even going so far as to signing a non-aggression pack with the killers led by Osama Bin Laden. Even more, over eight THOUSAND terrorists were trained in Iraq, including ones who have attacked not only innocent Iraqis, but Americans as well. Now, aside from making a few people cringe with his sexist remarks from his undisclosed jail cell, Hussein can terrorize no one any longer.

  • by

    genghisthehun

    Mon Jun 27 2005

    Fighting the war on terror is a job for counter-espionage types not regular army. This is a big waste of time, money and precious lives.

  • by

    canadasucks

    Mon Jun 27 2005

    There is no gentle way to say this- you are a complete imbecile if you believe this war has 'helped' the war on terror.

  • by

    inmyopinion

    Mon Jun 27 2005

    Brilliantly said by GoneAway. They tell us we are making all of this progress on fighting terrorism. But again, can you really fight a literal war, with troops and ivasions, on terrorism? Terrorism is abstract (not saying it doesn't exist, speaking in a philisophical manner, you can't literaly touch, and therefore, fight terrorism). You can fight terrorists, but you can't alltogether defete them.

  • by

    tjgypsy2

    Mon Jun 27 2005

    Sure we've progressed, how could we not? We invaded a nation peopled by a group that are known for fanatacism, and we've killed their children/husbands/brothers/fathers all in the name of freedom. I think every day we progressively make the War On Terror much more difficult, nigh impossible, to win. I think every time we drop a bomb, or abuse a prisoner, we're creating more terrorists. And even if we aren't creating them, we're certainly giving them a reason to focus on the American Homeland.

  • by

    spartacus007

    Mon Jun 27 2005

    The War on Terror is a 21st Century war, not a 19th or 20th Century one. Invading nations and capturing organization leaders doesn't help. It takes little effort for anyone with an internet connection and a couple hundred bucks to become a terrorist. We can't make progress in the War on Terror with land invasions anymore than we can make progress in the War on Murder with nuclear weapons.

  • by

    magellan

    Sun Jun 26 2005

    I guess the real problem with linking the war on terror to Iraq was that Iraq was simply not a terrorist threat before the Iraq war. They were a rogue nation lead by a monster, but they were not committing terrorist acts. Now Iraq is a hotbed for terrorism. My guess is that we will start to see Iraqis as suicide bombers (if we haven't already), even though at the beginning of the conflict it was a well known fact that Iraqi's don't do suicide bombs.