Lancaster Chew

Approval Rate: 98%

98%Approval ratio

Reviews 21

Sort by:
  • by

    stokersgirl01

    Sat May 22 2010

    I'd never buy Lancaster's again. The nicotine burn was nice, but the sweet flavor was just too much. It seemed like I had spit before I could savor the flavor because its like having a juicy fruit more then having a chew. I guess having to spit before you could try to enjoy the flavor is a good thing because this stuff is like the Mountain Dew of Chew. I was afraid I was going to get cavities before getting gum disease with this stuff. *Taylor's Is Still the Best By Far* Sorry Lancaster Lovers :(

  • by

    bigshiv

    Fri Oct 09 2009

    Lancaster is moist, has good flavor, doesn't have too many stems and twigs, and lasts quite a while. The pouch doesn't have a zip-seal, and it can be hard to find, but it's pretty good overall.

  • by

    mrchew

    Thu Jun 18 2009

    This is a good chew, but does have a sugar taste at times, flavor lasts long but turns to mush too too soon. Good price When the retails aell the buy one get one at the price of one not two

  • by

    mrvintage

    Fri Feb 13 2009

    Lancaster is actually a nice blend kind of has a creamy yet stout taste.It's pretty much stem-free but I think the cleaning process affects the consistency of the tobacco...I notice it doesn't hold a tight wad in one's cheek and seperates far too easily.A good tobacco but a tad over-priced.

  • by

    johnbrinks

    Sun Dec 07 2008

    lancaster without a doubt is the best,it lasts longer than any other pouch tobacco, the taste is wonderful its like saying hello to an old freind. the two for one deal is great except for those that sell it for two instead of buy one and get one free.

  • by

    headhunter90

    Thu Dec 04 2008

    This is the best chew i've ever had. No stems and very moist. Go with this stuff

  • by

    chalky

    Thu Dec 04 2008

    I prefer Wrigley Big League Chew myself...why don't you smokeless tobacco people try some of this.  It even comes in watermelon.

  • by

    grizzlyredman

    Wed Sep 24 2008

    chewed it before an am chewin it again. i think lancaster is beating out redman on quality here. i mean lancaster has zero stems and it rich, moist, soft, and tastes fuckin great. vote on this: is lancaster beating redman on quality? what do you think?

  • by

    adamnautopsy

    Sun Jul 20 2008

    i love lancaster. its very clean, moist and rich with flavor. definately the best on the market

  • by

    dukebuck

    Wed Jun 04 2008

    The best chew out there. Very moist with little to no stems. The chew has an incredible balance of sweetness without losing the tobacco richness. I used to chew Redman Golden Blend, but it's now become my 2nd choice if I can't get Lancaster.

  • by

    johnnyws6

    Tue May 20 2008

    I was really impressed. Super moist, nice rich and smooth flavor and NO STEMS. Highly Reccomended!

  • by

    oceansoul

    Tue Apr 22 2008

    Lancaster was the cleanest loose leaf on the market, hardly ever a stem in a pouch. The flavor was similar to coffee and very rich. This was my favorite when I chewed.

  • by

    firefighter805

    Sun Mar 16 2008

    Normally i chew Redman. But the other day i heard some one mention Lancaster. Anyways i found a bag yesterday and had to try it. It's the best chew out there to me. It has less stems than any other chew i've ever had. The flavor is perfect and it's mellow. Overall it's just a great chew you can really enjoy and naw on for a while. I never thought i would find a better chew than Redman...till i tried Lancaster, and you will be to.

  • by

    downhomega

    Tue Aug 14 2007

    Honesly Lancaster is the best chew out there. Its got great flavor and almost no stems. And plus its not as expensive as Levi or Red Man both of witch are full of stems. True it wont give you a buzz, but if you just want a buzz you need dip, not chew. If you want a quality tobacco with no stems Lancaster is close to perfect.

  • by

    grizzlymintman_12

    Thu Mar 29 2007

    I love this stuff

  • by

    mdurham

    Thu Sep 07 2006

    Taste aint bad but doesn't last long enough not even close to beechnut or Trophy but all round OK

  • by

    goodolboy

    Tue Aug 29 2006

    Hate it the taste is good but you cant chew it. If you don't actualy chew you chew than it is good, but if you are like me and like to chew it it sucks it breaks up and turns to mush.

  • by

    thenochewman

    Tue Dec 06 2005

    I just felt like I could eat it.

  • by

    thechewmasterh_olic

    Mon Dec 05 2005

    Not bad, good taste, lasts long, and not bad on price.

  • by

    nocera3chew

    Fri Apr 15 2005

    i always pretended that i actually had this stuff before. i always told my friends, i had that stuff before and its not half bad. well i hate to break it to you guys but i was lying all along. i really like renegade wintergreen pouches. they are my one and only true love. but thanks for playing along with me. RENEGADES 4 LIFE

  • by

    the_kingfish

    Sun Feb 08 2004

    Lancaster may be hard to find at times. Although I enjoy Red Man & Beechnut, this truly is a step above. Costing about 75 cents more, you'll recognize it as absolutely unique. A distinctively mellow butternutty taste that doesn't quit.