Karl Marx (1818-1883)
Approval Rate: 31%
Reviews 19
by ijnhy08d
Mon Apr 27 2009How could anyone have possibly figured that they had the power to turn the entire world communist, much less put all of planet Earth and all of mankind under a hard and ruthless dictatorship! Karl Marx is even to this very day a big hard and demonic global dictator and tyrant who rules the entire planet with a blunt iron fist. Because of him, homeownership is a complete and total myth; we are all renting our homes from the city and state governments. Renting through property taxes that can never be levied based on ability to pay, but based on the fact that the government owns every single square inch of the land and everything that sits upon the land (including the house) and you are 'borrowing' the house and the certain portion of that property that the house sits on from the government, and worse, if you can not pay your rent (property tax) on time, you are evicted, stripped of all posessions, and made homeless and all property is auctioned off to someone with a much higher income... Read more
by ilikepie
Sun Feb 24 2008A hypocritical individual (why would someone who believed in Marxism so heartily have a maid, for example?...) who had a half-baked idea. Sadly, fools got hold of this idea and believed it to be a work of genius. Step forward seventy years of fear, oppression and death.
by minniedoe
Tue Mar 20 2007I think Marx was and is misunderstood by many people. For example, he never assumed that a revolution would take place in a highly developed country, this country (and therefore the population of this country) firstly has to experience an extremely uncomfortable economic situation that becomes unbearable for the majority -then a revolution could happen. For me, one of the great thinkers, whose influence is tremendous. His writings on economy and history show a great ability for analysis and for seeing things in a wider context. But despite his intelligence he was not able to foresee the impact of his writings - we all know about the abuses that happened in the last century, therefore only 4 stars.
by broodinghen
Wed Nov 08 2006Selfish and devious. Ugly, in every possible sense of the word. Unable to get along by his own means, he needed Engels to inflict his nonsense on the world. Sometimes I wonder if Engels wasn't still worse. Curse them both.
by underspin
Tue Mar 07 2006Brilliant yet flawed idealistic intellectual who lacked common sense regarding human nature and basic predictions on history. Incapable of forcasting the totalitarian direction of his own theories when put into actual practice. Perhaps personally well-meaning, but as is sometimes said, too often the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
by caligula
Mon Apr 25 2005Smart, but flat out wrong. Believed in the certainty of human events in the future. Decent historian and economist, terrible predicter of future events.
by help_me
Sat Jun 21 2003had an excellent idea. too bad those so called communists completely misused his ideas.
by marconej
Mon May 19 2003Communism is not a natural state of man.
by holyman
Sat Mar 15 2003had a lot of misguided followers...
by gicaua91
Wed Feb 26 2003Fabricated his facts and Figures. Subversive literature from a violent man.
by anmalone
Wed Feb 26 2003Philosophy is the love of truth and by that definition Karl Marx as a supreme hater and a liar is not a philosopher. His writings are misguided revolutionary polemics based on hate filled envy and blood lust for power not economics, philosophy or science. He hijacked the dialectic from Hegel and materialism from Fuerbach. He was a moral and intellectual degenerate. Whose notable personal achievements were: 1). His utter failure to seek gainful employment to support his own large family. He was cruel acrimonious tyrant to all subordinates but a shameless fawning lickspittle with patrons. (Tenure anyone?) 2). The rape and abandonment of a mentally retarded serving girl who conceived and bore his child. 3). He never accepted the consequences or defended his writing when charged and fled from criminal prosecution. 4). His work was so filled with willful lies, misrepresentations and observations that were already false when he wrote them in 1848-1883 that only the invincibly... Read more
by resisobilus
Mon Feb 17 2003An idealist who miscalculated human nature.
by beach_bum
Fri Dec 27 2002I like his brother Groucho even better....
by freceira222
Wed Mar 20 2002it could work
by ellajedlicka21
Mon Oct 15 2001I agree with nasha. I recently did a report on Marx, he was a genius. Lenin and Stalin are a misrepresentation of Karl Marx. The decisions should be made to benefit the masses. Marx had some great ideas and would've worked wonders if there weren't oppressive dictators who followed him.
by noah4056
Fri Aug 03 2001Karl Marx can be described in one word . . . Demonic. His "philosophy" inspired other demonic individuals to murder millions of innocent human beings. Karl Marx, no doubt, has one of the hotter rooms in hell.
by bob_falange
Wed Jul 18 2001First, he got it totally wrong. His theory predicted that socialist revolution would inevitably come to highly industrialised societies. They didn't - peasant societies - Russia, China, Cuba - turned to communism, not Germany, Britain and the United States. Second, his followers unleashed upon the world a reign of terror, oppression and inhumanity which is the inevitable bedfellow of socialism. This disgusting and evil writer deserves total condemnation.
by generalissimo_mh
Fri Jun 01 2001His book is the moral equivalent of Mein Kampf.
by nashad8a
Sat Apr 21 2001An amazing life and amazing philosophy. Too bad he was mis-represented by both commies and capitalists