Jockey

Approval Rate: 81%

81%Approval ratio

Reviews 19

Sort by:
  • by

    aloha97

    Wed Jul 29 2009

    My only underwear now that I have is the new 3D-Jockey Innovations.....Mid-rise..... They are superb ! ! ! Worth every cent you spend. I have had these now for more than 1 year, and they fit and look like they did after the 1st wash. They appear almost new. A MUST for those in athletics. Keeps every thing in place. You won't need a jock. LATEST WORD IS THAT THESE ARE BEING DISCONTINUED ! I CANNOT BELIEVE IT. CHECKED IT OUT AT JOCKEY.COM YES, THEY ARE BEING DISCONTINUED WITH OVER 50 VERY POSSITIVE REVIEWS.

  • by

    anfry3dd

    Fri Mar 20 2009

    even though mid rise briefs came in colors, they were see-through, not a normal characteristic advertised, looks like bloody sausage under cotton napkin. had holes in it already. Also my muscular legs ripped the legholes before i could get it up to the waist, overall i want my money back cause i cant wear it without even scratching my balls still for the first time ever in briefs.

  • by

    attila

    Sun Sep 23 2007

    i tried the Jockey Elance String Bikini years ago and it was a terrible experience. i was pulling the rear edge bikini portion out of my ass crack constantly. then jockey came out with Jockey no-fly Pouch Boxer Brief. i bought one medium size at macy's and it fit great. that bikini crap was trashed as soon as i could purchase enough of the no-fly Pouch Boxer Briefs. i would never even consider anything but boxer briefs for everyday wear. if i want underwear constantly sliding up my ass ill just wear a thong. i only wear a thong at the gym underneath my jockey sport boxer briefs as an athletic supporter. its far more comfortable than traditional jockstraps. internationaljock.com/jockstraps.html i wear Mens Thong Underwear - Cotton Lycra Style 7623 from flexables.com the thong at the gym works for me but they do also have Bikini/Brief Styles. i would not wear a thong 24/7 all year long.

  • by

    tightiewhities

    Mon Mar 12 2007

    Jockey briefs are nice. If you go to WalMart, they have "Life" made by Jockey. The t shirts and a shirts are nice. The briefs are a little tight and low in the waist line, not as bad as Hanes. Life is too short to wear crummy underwear.

  • by

    rateitall1252

    Tue Feb 20 2007

    I've bought a Jockey Next To Nothing Thong and it was alright.  It was pretty comfortable, but it barely had enough room for you know what when you know what happens.

  • by

    rqtbllr

    Fri Nov 17 2006

    Love the elance line. Feels like next to nothing when I wear them.

  • by

    starfall

    Wed Sep 06 2006

    Jockey Form boxer is the best I have so far. Very soft and smooth.

  • by

    gaz999

    Sat Aug 05 2006

    Jockey Classic Y-Fronts (full rise) are probably the most masculine of all briefs, they are a "real man's" brief. They are soft, comfortable, supportive in all the right places and quite probably the best underwear on the planet!

  • by

    colin2001

    Wed Jun 28 2006

    jockey y-fronts are hard to beat for quality and value recently got the pouch briefs--fantastic

  • by

    jayzallme

    Thu May 11 2006

    I've worn the Jockey Low-Rise Flyless Pouch Brief, and I love them. I have them in grey, white and black, and they are one of my favorite underwear styles to wear. I also have a pair of blue Seamless Low-Rise Briefs. Great stuff there, too.

  • by

    ace8875f

    Wed Dec 07 2005

    Jockey's poco briefs are very comfortable, especially the ribbed kind. You still have support but it feels like you aren't wearing much, yet very comfortable. The low rise briefs I find less comfortable...boxer briefs are pretty good. Overall, Jockey seems better than many brands out there.

  • by

    musicprof

    Sun Aug 21 2005

    Just as uncomfortable as FOTL but more durable and the waistband holds up better.

  • by

    djahuti

    Wed Apr 13 2005

    Sturdy and well priced.

  • by

    jjm1965

    Wed Dec 01 2004

    Back in the '80s Jockey was my favorite. I switched to Hanes, Fruit Of The Loom and BVD in the early '90s due to budgetary reasons. In the last couple years I gave Jockey another try, but they changed something in the design, or they have a quality control issue; they feel tight on my legs (no, I did not gain weight). This happened with several packages of Jockey, and I compared the results between briefs and boxer briefs; same problem. I am sticking with Hanes for now.

  • by

    underwearer47

    Mon Jul 19 2004

    JOCKEY KNOWS HOW TO MAKE BRIEFS. I HAVE BEEN WEARING BOXERS BUT BRIEFS GIVE SOME SUPPORT AND JOCKEY MAKES STYLISH BRIEFS.

  • by

    virilevagabond

    Tue Feb 03 2004

    No real styling or 'pizazz' with Jockeys (what little there can be with underwear). There simply is no extra styling, comfort or quality gained by paying for a named brand when it comes to Jocky, as opposed to say Calvin Klein.

  • by

    jorganvonsting_le

    Tue Jun 17 2003

    This is overpriced crap, don't buy it! I have a pair with a horse on my butt! Who wants that, but a 6-year old? Enough said.

  • by

    allendale

    Sun Apr 20 2003

    I have worn Jockey, Hanes and FOTL most of my life, and you just CAN'T BEAT the FEEL of JOCKEY! I think it rules the men's underwear roost right now. Thanks, Allen Dale.

  • by

    markxxx

    Sat Jan 25 2003

    If you're looking for a label then buy these. Cause that is the only difference between these and Hanes or FOTL. Oh yes you're wallet feels better as there is less money in it.