Jim Rome Show
Approval Rate: 62%
Reviews 40
by tomdock1
Sat Oct 31 2009Jim Rome...wow.....I mean how lame.......can you be?..........Who gives a crap.........if Romo.......eats a dog.......even if.......hes a pro..............Please pull your bloated head out of your........bum and quit being an ass......your show.......is irrelevent.........really.
by zibble
Sat Jul 11 2009Rome's show was refreshing at one time - mid '90s? Now just an annoying rehash of the same old : shtick. The callers used to make the show but they are pretty much barred from the show now.
by irishgit
Fri Aug 01 2008Annoying speech patterns that drive me crazy on radio. Besides that, he's just one more of the virtually indistinguishable mass of sports shock jocks on the airwaves
by samrsf8c
Fri Aug 01 2008Wow wtt you played high school sports. You must be an amazing athlete.
by bclaw9a8
Mon Mar 24 2008so so hip, bull
by skiboaty
Wed Oct 10 2007One of the worst personalities in radio. His "dead air" lasts longer than his interviews and he boosts his own ego by labeling callers as "clones." I think Jim Everett should be an in-studio guest sometime to finish this loser off once and for all.
by wttfe076
Fri Aug 31 2007"Romey" 's show has funny moments, but he reminds me of a guy I went to high school with in massachusetts -- the kind who wants be in the Jock crowd, hang out with jocks--but wasn't an actual jock himself. I lettered in 3 sports in high school--and I knew guys like him, that just wanted to be your friend because you got some fame. OUT.
by alanlovesdevon
Sat Apr 28 2007This man has a terrible speaking style, not at all suited for radio.
by ben999
Sat Feb 17 2007He seems intelligent but he knows NOTHING about sports. He only states the obvious, like "Allen Iverson is a good basketball player." Duh! that's why he plays in the NBA. He needs to think about going into a field other than sports
by victor83
Sat Feb 17 2007I only enjoyed Rome's show one time...When jim Everett whipped his ***.
by genghisthehun
Sat Feb 17 2007I saw replays of the Jim Everett controversy at the time, and I reviewed in on YouTube. Rome absolutely had it coming, the smarmy mope. Except for the liability problems, Everett should have smacked him a couple times. That is how those smart-ass "journalists" may learn a lesson. Bad acts have consequences. It's a good thing that Rome was not interviewing, let's say, Andy Jackson or Aaron Burr. Those two knew how to get even.
by loerke
Sat Dec 09 2006Rome revolutionized sports talk. I hated sports radio programs, which tended to feature nothing but stupid jocks (Tom Tolbert excepted), until Rome appeared on the scene. He brought an evocative new lingo into the world. Those reviewers who claim that his listeners are idiots had better check their own brains. Name anyone in sports talk who is sharper or wittier than Rome. I can understand the critique of his interviewing style; I usually tune out because he does kiss butt during interviews (but who doesn't?). I can also understand if you don't dig his attitude, but don't call him stupid, because he's smarter than you.
by h8rome
Tue Dec 05 2006Rome makes me want to puke. Three hour show, half of which is in total silence. He won't talk about the games themselves, but the sensationalist hype surrounding them. He has made a career of catering to the world's dumbest sports fans (the clones), who apparently never get tired of Rome's constant bitching and whining. Go to hell Rome.
by toydingo
Sun Aug 20 2006There is no getting used to Jim Rome. If you have an IQ above 95 his dead-water criticism and lukewarm jokes of anything he doesn't understand (such as the world of soccer) gets old very, very quickly. Jim Rome is a number cruncher, simple as that. He has no knowledge of anything outside the world of football, basketball, and a few other american sports. Avoid at all cost lest you lose too many braincells and become one of his "clones".
by splinterdand
Mon Jun 12 2006Rome is not nearly as significant as he seems to think he is. Without his clones(70 to 90 IQ range), his stupid show wouldn't exist. Prime example: Immediately following a stupid interview with an idiot hockey player who doesn't have enough sense to put in a mouth piece he proceeded to diss the world cup and soccer in general. Doesn't he know that soccer fans don't listen to his crap? Give it up, Gnome. Only the metal-head clones (70 to 90 IQ range) are listening.
by canadasucks
Wed May 31 2006Kiss-ass jock-sniffer who tosses softball questions- the worst kind of poseur. . .pretends to be a renegade but is simply a follower. . .
by scotti4
Wed May 31 2006Anyone that bashes Romey obviously didnt give it the 2 weeks like he asks. Your not gonna get it right away.I can tell just from the reasoning. I have been listening for about 10 years now, everyday I catch at least an hour over lunch. He is very well informed about his guests and sports in general. If you dont like his humour you should learn how to laugh. He is the smartest funniest person on the radio period. Everyone else isnt in the same ball park....Out!
by trebon1038
Wed May 31 2006I don't care for his tv show so much but I love his radio show. He really dogs the morons that email or call him. He has some great interviews as well. He takes some getting used to...he can be brash, but he says it how it is and I find his show enertaining.
by thatcreepylaug_h
Tue Apr 04 2006To those of you who hate on Jim Rome: Who is better than him? Dan Patrick--that snoozefest?--I swear I almost pass out driving when listening to that guy. Mike & Mike--LMAOROFLWTF?? Tony Kornheiser--who needs 10 clowns in the studio with him to hold up his show?? Colin Cownerd--one of the more geeky radio hosts out there. The fact that he is the #1 syndicated sports radio host must mean he is doing something right. Jim Rome owns all.
by johnnypuke
Thu Jan 19 2006I find him to be an annoying hipster wannabe. Tries desperatly to be cool to no avail.
by upstateny12065
Wed Jan 04 2006This guy is a complete moron. He offers no insight and no humor whatsoever. Pure unadulterated stupidity. I grew up listening to WFAN in New York - now THAT is real sports radio. I can't believe he actually has an audience to justify his airtime. I have tried to listen to him on several occasions and usually end up switching the station within 5 minutes. Just plain terrible all around.
by daedalus
Mon Dec 12 2005The Jungle is so much different than all the other tired sports stuff it makes this an easy pick. Rome and his clone followers have perfected a new language. The only thing that would make it better for me is if there were a few less interviews with athletes with nothing to say and more smack. There have been some really good interviews too like Steve Elkington, John Cook and Evil Knievel to name a few, but nothing is as good as listening to Rome go off. War Romey!
by massah1571
Wed Oct 05 2005what can you say....the man says exactly what is on his mind....you have got to respect that!
by romeyont_1200
Fri Aug 05 2005Jim Rome is the best radio talk show out there, period. All you dorks saying he's immature and does the same old schtick don't listen to the show, or if you have, are too uptight and take yourselves waaaay too seriosuly. Interviews, calls, emails and takes are all great, Romey's da man. Would like to see Jay Mohr guest host the Jungle more often though, guy's just as, if not more funny than Rome.
by sfbandit
Thu Aug 04 2005HUGE? No............... this........... show....... sucks. He get's good interviews, too bad he does NOTHING with them. Best time to tune in to the show is when someone else is hosting (right now it's Roger Lodge with Pete Rose -- GREAT show). Whoever wrote below that it takes a while to understand and that once you do - it's great (????) - obviously has the intellect of a crouton.
by ron_e_g
Wed Feb 02 2005How does this guy still have a show. The same pathetic losers call every week for a childish essay contest where the host gives bland, one word responses. Hey, Jim, this R_A_D_I_O you moron. What is with the continuous Dead-Air!.
by jerryswoh
Fri Nov 05 2004Simple formula, really. Make a joke about the topic of the day, repeat joke ad nauseum. Get a caller to ramble about his/her sports opinions quickly. Rack 'em if good. A simple, and very tiresome, formula for hearing basically the same thing every day. The interviews are about the only thing that make the show tolerable in any sense.
by philkid3
Fri Oct 29 2004You want someone who tells it like it is and isn't afraid of throwing punches, like Rome? Try Dan Patrick. Same thing with none of the childish, punkish attitude. And what's the deal with takes?
by clearview
Fri Oct 22 2004I use to listen regularly, but quickly tired of his repetitive comments. I also find his format a distraction. Let's grow up Jim - the show has grown old with your unsophisticated groupies you call clones, your stupid have a take contests and interviews with has beens. How about some pure unadulterated sports talk without the sideshow circus acts.
by drtaamc
Tue Sep 28 2004Very entertaining, it's too bad the main emphasis of his show is sports...not that I'm against sports it's just this guy is so funny, and he'd be great to hear skewering or shall I say giving his take on politics.
by chrgrfndan
Mon Sep 27 2004One of the best shows on radio period. Most who don't like it just don't get it. It takes a while to figure out what he's doing but once you do you will be hooked.
by al_zeimers
Fri Sep 03 2004The best show on radio. Has educated takes, comedy, serious interviews. He gets all the top athletes/personalities in, and also mixes in the occasional author/actor/musician. If you don't like it, change the station!!!
by widgeon
Tue Aug 24 2004Rome gets interviews that others only dream of and if you don't get the show lighten up Sally
by wetterhorn
Thu Aug 12 2004All sophomoric schtick and no substance!
by foamjack
Wed Aug 04 2004That interview was great.Im great. The more of me and less of you is great. F*#@ YOU!
by amsurfer
Wed Jun 16 2004Emails are hilarious!
by alpepper
Wed May 26 2004Since the death of good music (i.e., replaced by Britney, Justin, Gangsta Rap, and Kid Rock...ugh) as I know it, I have listened to sports talk radio almost exclusively since 1998. Sports talk radio shows come and go; but Jim Rome is the undisputed king. To be a great sports talk show, you need to balance hardcore X and Os, with what's going outside of sports, have callers (shows, like the awful Mike & Mike, rarley have callers), and have humor. Some shows, like the off the air Tony Kornheiser focused too much on non-sports things (like what the girl's on The View were wearing) that it got annoying. Jim Rome's The Jungle has it all. It's 3 hours of the best radio entertainment around. Rome's hilarious takes (punctuated by those dead air pauses), great interviews, and great callers has espoused a counter culture with its own language (called smack). If you know the significance of Why Dodgers' pitcher Odalis Perez is referred to as an Open Faced Roast Beef Sandwich, then you are ... Read more
by mysteryman
Tue May 25 2004Love the long pause for................................................ ...............................no reason. Claa-sic.
by jemiculus
Mon Apr 26 2004Usually entertaining, though sometimes he has a tendency to dwell on the same joke way too long.
by pipsicord
Tue Apr 13 2004You have to love sports to understand, PLUS, Rome is the most knowledgeable person I have ever listened to with respect to MOST sports. His knowledge is incredible.