Grover Cleveland (1885-1889 AND 1893-1897)
Approval Rate: 64%
Reviews 23
by eric_offshore_drilling_is_cool
Sat Jul 12 2008I don't know much about him
by genghisthehun
Tue Feb 20 2007Not much going on here, but then we didn't need or expect a lot. The country was growing and what guidance did we need, really?
by billyguns2
Wed Dec 13 2006One of the brighter lights among the generally long descent from the glories of the Founding Fathers to the present dark ages and the age of George W. Bush, lies, and thuggery.
by oscargamblesfr_o
Thu Nov 02 2006Decent enough President, probably ranking somewhere in the middle. Wouldn't have wanted him anywhere near my snacks though.
by lion_in_winter
Fri Apr 28 2006A recent restrospective of Clevelands two terms give a less then flattering view of the man- nonetheless he did begin to understand the need for reform in some of the nations burgeoning huge business trusts, as well as reforms for workers rights, child labor reform, government reform in food processing, and womens sufferage.
by jed1000
Mon Nov 28 2005Believed that his job was not to do good things but to keep bad things from happening.. During his first term he used his veto twice as many times as all his predecessors combined.. Answered his own phone and even answered the White House door himself.. The first and only President to get married in the White House.. Doomed his reelection campaign in 1888 when he came down against pensions for Civil War veterans.. Actually won the popular vote in 1888 but lost the Electoral College.. On leaving the White House the first time his wife told the staff to take good care of the place because she and her husband would be back - and they were four years later.
by haylee
Thu Sep 22 2005You people should be ashamed of your self he was a President and most importantly he was a person like us and how would you feel if someone called you terrible when all you did was to help people? well,well thats what i thought ! he was my favorite pres. so your TERRIBLE.
by chagoth
Wed Jul 27 2005Robert Higgs, Research Director for the Independent Institute, said this of Clevelsnd, He kept the country at peace. He respected the Constitution, acknowledging that the national government has only a limited mission to perform and shaped his policies accordingly. He fought to lower tariffs; preserved the gold standard in its time of crisis; and restored order forcibly when hoodlums disturbed the peace on a wide front during the great railroad strike of 1894. Though I disagree with Mr. Higgs on many fronts, he nails my opinion of Cleveland perfectly. Grover Cleveland greatness can not be overstated. He is easily one of the five greatest presidents in U.S. history.
by guru2djpremier
Thu Aug 26 2004Hardest working president of all time. Did his best to fulfill the mandate of the people although his own opinions and policies were not fully known.
by onehungrymonst_er
Wed Aug 25 2004A good President. He almost became President three times. He didn't do a lot (there wasn't much to be done), but he did stabilize the economy and forbid us into stealing Hawaii (which we later stole anyway).
by john_mccain
Sun Jun 27 2004Good reformer.
by mysteryman
Tue May 25 2004I second the 'one star per nonconsecutive terms.' Probably a stooge for Montgomery Burns.
by abichara
Sun Jan 25 2004Grover Cleveland was very principled as President, but he didn't really do a good job pushing his agenda. At heart, Cleveland was a classic Jeffersonian. He believed in individual initiative and this appealed to the rural core of the Democratic party, which at that time was based in the rural areas of this country. In many ways however, Cleveland was fighting the tides of change. The Industrial Revolution was gaining steam in this country and along with this, workers were beginning to demand their rights. Centralization was inevitable in a society like this and Cleveland didn't respond to the mood of the country. Trusts, huge business enterprises, were beginning to drown out the small entrepreneur. Cleveland, for all his advocacy for the little person, was tied down by a strict constitutional view that the President could not intervene to break up these entities. Democrats tried however to turn the issue on the Republicans, charging that they wanted to stop fair competition by endorsin... Read more
by redoedo
Sat Jun 07 2003Grover Cleveland is the only President to ever preside over two seperate administrations, one fro 1885-1889 and the other from 1893-1897. He was a man of devout principle. Cleveland was also a man of honesty and devotion, and every single executive action he made while in office was made because he believed it to be the right thing to do. However, unfortunately, he was unable to exhibit necessary amounts of leadership, espescially during the economic depression during his second term. [Presidential Leadership: ** out of ***** Stars] As I mentioned before, Grover Cleveland failed to exhibit much leadership during his time in the White House. Several pieces of important legislation were passed during his administration, but not due to his efforts. He did advocate significant tariff reductions, but due to his lack of leadership, was unable to achieve much change in that area. He vetoed several bills which would have provided drought relief to western farmers, something which did not help ... Read more
by glorp3ad
Fri May 23 20031 star for each of his nonconsecutive terms
by solenoid_dh
Wed Apr 09 2003Probably the best Democrat to serve as President. He tried to handle the economy with wisdom and discretion, instead of wasting taxpayer dollars in order to buy popularity and votes for himself. He also knew how to ignore bad advice.
by boys5c43
Thu Feb 13 2003he was the best president
by comrade
Fri Feb 01 2002Blaine should have been president. Clevlan was scum.
by scarlatti84
Sat Jun 16 2001Although the best known of the "forgettable" presidents, Grover Cleveland is still best forgotten. Firstly, he was a snob and refused to cough up money for injured war veterans. Secondly, he LOVED the workingman--he treated the strikers at the monumental Pullman Strike of the early 1890's with a welcoming boatload of scabs and strike-beaters. Cleveland's days were a sad time for civil rights of both workers and blacks (Plessy vs. Ferguson). He humiliated the nation in the Panic of 1893 when the gov't was so impoverished that he had to beg J. P. Morgan to lend the nation money. Also, he was a little bit of a sicko. He raised a young girl called Frances in his household. When she was 21 he married her--he was 48. A bit like marrying your daughter... nice man, worked hard, lots of grit--but as I said, better forgotten...
by christandkevin_p
Thu Jun 07 2001This man was moral, even doing things that were unpopular.
by jesicas_sun
Fri Jun 01 2001Grover - you are a mad man!!!!!! Actually I don't have any idea what you did - I just like the name Grover!!!!!
by bigjjf92
Thu Feb 08 2001The only President to regain his seat - that takes some toughness!
by ruby9916
Thu Oct 26 2000I'm anxious to read a biography that just came out on Cleveland. I believe its subtitled "a study in character" or something along those lines. I want to do my own research but the impression I received from some recent discussions about Cleveland is that he was a great defender of limited gov't, sound currency and economic freedom -- and a pricipled man as well. Told by advisors to drop his objections to trade tariffs because it would cost him the 1888 election (it did), he refused by saying: "What's the use of getting elected if you don't stand for something?" As someone who doesn't consider himself a Republican but appears partisan b/c the 20th century Democratic Party has been full of such despicable characters, I'm happy to have found a Democrat I can look up to! Here's to Grover Cleveland!