Charles (Charlie) Chaplin

Approval Rate: 92%

92%Approval ratio

Reviews 7

Sort by:
  • by

    irishgit

    Tue Sep 29 2009

    Better than average, probably a 3.5 which I'm generously rounding to 4, but not much more than that. I'm also curious, where are the folks who brand Polanski with the kiddy-raper tag when it comes to this guy? Try to to be consistent, folks.

  • by

    marcelina

    Thu Aug 28 2008

    love his work

  • by

    909006e3

    Sat May 17 2008

    Chaplain is mediocre at best and frankly boring. Cinematography is (and would have) gotten along just fine without his childish tedium.

  • by

    ma_duron

    Sat May 12 2007

    Along with Griffith, Arbuckle, Lloyd and Keaton, Chaplin contributed significantly to cinema narrative with masterpieces such as 'The Gold Rush.' (Extract from my comments on RIA to Leni Riefenstahl's 'Triumph of the Will'): Chaplin's "...political views, as subliminally conveyed in his movies - many shorts; 'The Kid'; 'City Lights'; 'Modern Times'; etc. - made many opinion-makers uncomfortable enough to consider him subversive, a sympathizer of Communism and an enemy of American values, any and all of which he might have been at some degree or other. It became enough so by the late 1940s that it was necessary for him to leave and make his home in Switzerland, instead. Had the Soviet Union become more of a threat still, Chaplin conceivably might today be as tainted and repudiated as have been Reich master Architect Albert Speer, Berlin Philharmonic Director Wilhelm Furtwangler, his successor, pianist and conductor Herbert Von Karajan and (Leni) Riefenstahl, among others." But, where do... Read more

  • by

    moosekarloff

    Mon Sep 29 2003

    He was the hottest ticket around during the WWI era, and used solid gifts to his advantage, but once talkies came along this guy demonstrated that his talents were limited. The first international star due to the lack of language block the silents provided, but once he was required to speak in order to educe comedic effct, he was lost. Did direct two fine films: "The Gold Rush," and "Modern Times," but the rest of the canon is so-so. Today, in comparison to his comtemporary Buster Keaton, Charlot's work seems creaky and clunky, because it is.

  • by

    pegs_uk

    Tue Mar 11 2003

    Without Charlie Chaplin, the other directors in this chart may not have existed. He turned the movies into an art form through his comedy and pathos. I used to think that silent movies were boring, but how wrong was I!! I only had to watch five minutes of "The Gold Rush" and was hooked. That is the legacy of a good director, that someone like me can come along 80 years later and laugh just as much as those who saw it first time round.

  • by

    texxb0b2

    Mon Nov 26 2001

    Parctically invented the art form and its first international star. Mixed pathos with comedy and wasn't affraid to have the hero fail at his objective. The Great Dictator defines how to make a parody.