Animal testing for cosmetics
Approval Rate: 37%
Reviews 41
by moomoocathy
Thu Apr 26 2012I don't know how this works so I can't say anything about this one.
by themes2012
Sun Feb 26 2012Animal testing is the use of non-human animals
by twansalem
Tue Aug 17 2010Cruel, perhaps. But I'd rather they do a little animal testing before releasing the product for human use. Better them than us.
by jester002
Fri Jan 15 2010Ok..now to all the ladies out there...other than alergic reactions, (which to me means you shouldn't wear make up in the first place) what are they putting in this crud that forces them to test this stuff to begin with?
by laren616
Mon Jan 04 2010Why cant we just use people?
by samiiiii
Tue Aug 04 2009poor animals. they can feel everything
by frankswildyear_s
Tue Aug 04 2009What's the big deal? My Border Collie smells a little better with a bit of Sarah Jessica Parker's Lovely behind each ear and under her tail and the other dogs seem to find it alluring. And a bunch of uppity humans feel the need to protest in the streets. Geez.
by lnentacb
Mon May 25 2009NO way Not today Not ever
by max_da_king
Sat Jan 31 2009FUCK NO
by snoopdaddi
Fri Jan 02 2009IT IS TOTALLY WRONGE!!
by starktruth
Fri Jan 02 2009What amazes me is that they can get those cute little critters to fill out the tests. Are they multiple choice or essay? Do they provide translators? How are they able to hold the #2 pencils in their paws to completely fill in the little circles? Who exactly is it that determines if fluffy looks 'hot' 'smokin hot' or just plain 'trashy' in that fire-engine red lipstick? And please... does the glittery blue eye shadow on muffins really make her fido hot? I think not. I'm afraid that I'll have to vote no on animal testing for cosmetics...
by ashlynne
Tue Dec 30 2008Hate!!! I did a report on it! It's no better than wearing there fur! =[
by francisco9446
Fri Dec 26 2008nooo heck nooo shove the hair products up your .........!!!!
by shelly
Mon Dec 22 2008again disturbing!!
by mimmeh
Mon Dec 15 2008*shoots people who does that*
by ambera14
Wed Dec 10 2008fuck that shit
by genghisthehun
Wed Dec 10 2008I am "shocked" and amused. Does any of the one star posters not use deoderant, or lipstick, or aftershave, or mascara, or rouge, or hair dye, or lip gloss or other products? Does anyone out there use bath soap?Come on, give me a break. You all do, folks, and these products must be tested before human use!
by numbah16tdhaha
Wed Dec 10 2008Monkeys and mascara don't mix. UPDATE: I've been told that my original review is a numbah hall of fame one-liner. For the record, I think we should test the stuff on convicts...
by keys115
Mon Dec 08 2008I bet that almost all of you are wearing cosmetics or use cleaning products tested on animals so stop being such hippocrates and look at the greater good of things
by jo13dae7
Sat Nov 22 2008non-human animals?
by dale_8577
Sun Nov 02 2008NO! NO! NO! NO! NO!
by doll_parts
Mon Oct 20 2008shhot em!!!
by alyssa2057
Wed Oct 15 2008Hate animal testing
by kayla_starr
Mon Oct 13 2008This is even so stupid to have on this quiz of course animal testing is dumb!
by livvyloo
Fri Oct 10 2008Test it on humans.
by trebon1038
Sun Oct 05 2008no, no, and hell no
by tracie9629
Fri Oct 03 2008If you are going to test things like cosmetics then you need to test them on willing humans
by marcelina
Thu Oct 02 2008I don't know... Can't we just test cosmetics for prolonged, painful ITCHY skin rashes on the buttcheeks of the men who judge women by these shallow standards?
by lucy_jane
Wed Oct 01 2008boooooooo
by ashley506
Wed Oct 01 2008we shouldn't use animals to test out our cosmetic...lets find a different solution
by jim9713
Wed Oct 01 2008In the first place, cosmetics are stupid.
by jhena06e
Wed Oct 01 2008Lot of folks out there that would sign up to be lab rats for free, (As long as they get to keep the make-up lol )
by aleashac
Wed Sep 17 2008It is a common misconception that most tests on animals are carried out with the aim of finding a cure for cancer, AIDS, or other devastating human diseases.
by molfan
Fri Apr 18 2008cruel.would not want a cosemetic that practiced this barbaric procedure. poor babies being hurt this way. how would humans like to endure this torture all for cosmetics.
by x_factor_z
Thu Dec 27 2007No, test cosmetics on willing PETA memeber volunteers instead.
by xtreme2252
Mon Nov 26 2007cruel
by marumarum
Fri Sep 28 2007They have been doing cosmetics for centuries and without any animal testings. Nowadays they put mostly dangerous chemicals in cosmetic products and need to know how much these poisonous compounds they can put in lipstick or mascara without killing humans immediately. They make 100 or 1000 times stronger poisons and wait how many hours it will take until animals are dead. So they can compute how long it will take until people start dying or getting sick and if it's over 2 years then nobody can sue them. It's just legal thing- only cosmetic companies that use no natural compounds do animal tests. Other animal experiments are totally useless- you can test diapers by wetting it with water and you don't have be a chemistry genius to test that HCl will burn your skin. It's not about stepping on ants or spiders, but avoiding damage that can be avoided to animals. Is killing humans OK, if some of us are killing ants by accident or people are dying in war anyway?
by lightfinger200_0
Sun Apr 15 2007everyone who rated a 1,I respect your view but it is narrowminded.I am not informed yet I know many animals are mistreated,testing in itself is not mistreatment.I would like to see if other ways are possible/viable but what is things such as toilet paper,feminine hygeine products,someone mentioned shampoos etc...not tested or worse tested on humans.I hate to say it but traditionally compared to humans animals are expendable and if you don't think so I challenge you not to kill a spider,step on an ant,swat a fly,bug spray a cockroach,or trap a mouse.And respectively chihuahua,animals were put on this planet and we were given dominion over them.That means we also have been given the commandment to act responsably in regards to them as well as use them for the betterment of our lives .
by victor83
Sun Apr 15 2007I am an animal lover and don't condone abuse. But I guess it is okay that collagen is derived from aborted babies, huh?
by xagent
Sun Apr 15 2007I don't know. Something about seeing a monkey wearing lipstick just isn't appealing to me. But that's just me.
by puppyloverkb
Thu Mar 08 2007In response to Genghisthehun, yes I use shampoo, but I always check the label to make sure the product was not tested on animals. I would much rather have the companies test their products on humans...after all we are the ones using them! And in response to Lightfinger2000, comparing a dog to a cockoach is a little outragous! Yes, i step on cockroaches and i sure as hell will kill a black widow if I see one but how anyone can condone locking a dog in a cage and only taking it out to plaster makeup all over it is beyond me! Yes, we were given "dominion" over dogs, but with that comes respecting that dominance as well. Parents are given dominence over their kids but you don't see anyone condoning child abuse! Dogs have feelings, every day when i come home from work i see the light spark up in my dogs eyes as they jump all over me trying to greet me. It is people with minds like yours that allow this to torture to continue to happen to these animals. It must stop! I leave you with this qu... Read more