Andrew Johnson (1865-1869)
Approval Rate: 42%
Reviews 30
by jr1990
Thu Dec 11 2008Why in the world did Lincoln choose Johnson as his running mate?
by mrjackhammer
Wed Mar 19 2008almost as bad as slick willy
by irishgit
Fri May 25 2007Doubtful whether anyone came to the presidency under more difficult circumstances. While he clearly does not have the stature of a Washington, Jefferson or Lincoln, Johnson is far from incompetent, and manages a few accomplishments while beset with opponents on virtually every side. He's a long way above the bottom feeders on this list.
by genghisthehun
Tue Feb 20 2007He muddled through. He had a trying situation and had extremely strong opposition. He really didn't have any tools. He had no education and it is said his wife taught him how to read!
by billyguns2
Wed Dec 13 2006Andrew Johnson was the wrong man at the wrong time, a pig-headed, unrepentant disaster who gave us 100 years of ill feelings after the Civil War; oh, if Lincoln had only lived! Southern Democrats, former slave owners and the Ku Klux Klan never had a stauncher ally than Andrew Johnson, who also suffered the indignity of impeachment and was saved from ousting by one vote in the U.S. Senate.
by ih8rateitall
Sat Mar 11 2006Who is this?
by jed1000
Tue Feb 21 2006Never attended school. His future wife, Eliza McCardle, taught him to write at the age of 17. Only wore suits that he custom-tailored himself.
by chagoth
Thu Jul 28 2005Though Johnson deserves some credit for following many of Lincoln's Reconstruction policies, he didn't do nearly enough to protect the freedman against Southern aggression.
by gopmember76
Mon Jul 18 2005History placed him in an interesting and ironic situation. Obviously Lincoln was the person best-suited to pursue Reconstruction with the South. Sumner and Stevens overshadowed and overpowered Johnson.
by inmyopinion
Thu Jun 02 200517th president of he USA? No, 2nd president of the CSA.
by mr_democratic
Sat Apr 30 2005He made many mistakes, but he tried his best to give the South a voice, what would you have done? You wouldn't have had a clue.
by drbowler
Wed Mar 23 2005Him after Lincoln is like a kid playing a kazoo after a great band performance.
by kipprabbit
Sun Mar 06 2005quite possibly the most racist president we have ever had
by james76255
Thu Feb 24 2005I can't imagine being in his position. Essentially a Democrat endorsed by Republicans, he was a Southerner that became President of the Unites States just as the war between the Union and the Southern States was drawing to a close. This is all on top of being a Southerner that becomes president after another Southerner kills President Lincoln. There are a dozen things like this you can point to that could have made him a moderator of sorts, helping to unify a divided country. For some, those same dozen reasons, by no fault of his, could have been seen as a reason to keep things divided. All things considered, he did what he could during a difficult time in history and somehow managed to keep things from becoming to chaotic. In calmer times, he might have been considered a better president.
by maikuhaiku
Fri Feb 11 2005John McCain, I'm afraid political history is definitely NOT one of your strong suits. Johnson was impeached, but not convicted, as another user has pointed out. Now I don't think he was a bad president, but I do believe that he probably wasn't strong enough to reunite the two halves of America, still torn by emotions and resentment after the Civil war.
by aurumdragon
Sun Jan 23 2005His problem was he followed the wrong guy into the white house. But he was better than the other Johnson.
by ill_rate_this
Sat Nov 27 2004He was from North Carolina, a state that in most areas is STILL part of the confederate states of america that in itself should have screamed BAD PRESIDENT!!!!!
by bsd987
Thu Nov 04 2004He gets a 2. John McCain, he WAS impeached. He was not convicted. He was a stupid, stupid man and had no people skills. Otherwise, he'd be a 4.
by democratic_patriot
Wed Sep 15 2004O.K. He was horrible, I admit it. Probably the third-worst President ever. BUT he was better than W.
by capanson
Fri Sep 10 2004Drank his way into obscurity
by john_mccain
Sun Jun 27 2004Should have been impeached. Set civil rights back a hundred years.
by gopman79
Tue Mar 16 2004This guy was a real stiff. He didn't deserve to be impeached, but he still was one of the worst presidents in history, due to his failure to be fair to Blacks during Reconstruction.
by redoedo
Sat Jun 07 2003Less than a week after the Confederacy surrendered, Abraham Lincoln was assassinated in Washington D.C. Andrew Johnson took office with Republicans confident that he would continue Lincoln's policies. Lincoln had not adopted a plan for Reconstruction, but he seriously had considered a "moderate" Reconstruction Plan which included the states simply swearing loyalty and abolishing slavery. Johnson himself adopted a similar program, but a firm believer in states' rights and a southernor himself, he did not please his own Republican party. (1)Crisis Leadership: 1 out of 5 Stars- By December 1865, Johnson had his own Reconstruction Plan created, which was based almost entirely on Lincoln's. It consisted of requiring the Confederate states to pledge an oath of loyalty and abolish slavery. He agreed to pardon most southernors in return for their oath of loyalty. Johnson, refused, however to pardon high ranking officers of the Confederacy such as political and military leaders. However, Johns... Read more
by yrfanab2
Sun Feb 23 2003It took courage to stay with the union even when his home state seceded from the Union.
by clover38
Sun Mar 18 2001too bad HE wasn't scalped.
by bigjjf92
Thu Feb 08 2001I'm glad he wasn't impeached but the Republicans should never have let him have the Vice-Presidency.
by abichara
Sun Nov 26 2000Andrew Johnson did a decent job of getting our country back on the road to recovery after the Civil War through Reconstruction. Lincoln could have never done it because he was an extremely divisive person, especially in the South. Johnson was a Tennessean whom the South could at least respect. He brought the nation together and that is enough to give him a good rating.
by flai6201om
Mon Jun 12 2000THE DAVID DUKE OF THE 19TH CENTURY.
by zzz_at_5413om
Thu Mar 16 2000"Andrew Johnson" does sound a lot like "Andrew Jackson". However, it was Andrew Jackson who was so influential in establishing US policy toward Native Americans. He was known as an "Indian fighter" before he was president, and as president he was very much behind the Indian Removal Act. The principle responsibility for the Trail of Tears, on which so many suffered and died as they were forced to walk endless miles to be relocated away from their homes, falls on him -- not Johnson.
by xxx_at_5409om
Thu Mar 16 2000If I recall correctly, he was a big proponent of (if not the originator of) the US policy of genicide against American Indians.