Thomas L. Friedman

reviewed by abichara

Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times columnist and bestselling author specializing in world events.

abichara
09/16/2012

Thomas L. Friedman 2

He's more of a neo-liberal, but really the differences between a hard-core neoconservative and a neo-liberal oftentimes simply comes to methods and execution.

This is a guy who recently argued that the Soviet Union never represented a threat to the US. Apparently he's forgotten that whole episode with Nikita Khrushchev banging his shoe on a table, threatening that "we will bury you," or a major confrontation like the Cuban Missile Crisis, or Berlin, or any other number of skirmishes during the Cold War. What's even more odd is that he considers Iran, a nation with only $7 billion in military expenditures against our $700 billion, no nuclear weapons, or delivery capabilities, a graver physical security threat to the US than the Soviets were.

Tell me again why he still has a regular spot on the op-ed page of the NY Times. Surely there are more meritorious writers out there than this guy.

Add your Vote:

Votes on this review: 5 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree
No Comments View All
You must be logged in to comment. login now.
About This Reviewer
By the Numbers