| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | trebon1038 (64)
11/10/2005 | Ok, here is the thing on the terrorists. These people are selected as children and raised to believe that they are marters. They will die for their cause. If they are willing to kill themselves for their cause then I do not have any problem killing them.
(6 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Mr.Political (18)
10/08/2005 | I won't be losing any sleep, that's for sure.
(6 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | zuchinibut (40)
10/06/2005 | If the terrorist can be taken alive without a serious threat to the lives of those capturing him/her, then I say that it would be wrong to kill them. If that terrorist is in the process of trying to harm others, then I don't have a problem with them being killed, but if there is no threat to innocent lives, then I think the terrorists should be captured alive and made to deal with their crimes in prison.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Jboogz (0)
10/06/2005 | A life for a life will never truly solve a problem. You may feel some form of temporary satisfaction in knowing a terrorist is dead. However, as time passes the existence or lack there of that terrorist will have no great significance or effect on your daily routine.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| jaywilton (27)
10/06/2005 | Of course;but better to identify them in advance and send in The Purple Gang.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| kattwoman (24)
10/05/2005 | after the loss of life on 9/11 if thats what it takes to keep them from ever harming another person i say go for it. but it seems like most terrorists commit suicide in the process of destroying human life that we will never get that pleasure.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | GenghisTheHun (173)
10/05/2005 | If this is part of a rational plan of counter-terrorism yes. If it is random terror, no.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-7 OF 7 | View All |