Hillary Rodham Clinton
Approval Rate: 55%
Reviews 14
by guy_dc1b
Wed Oct 28 2015She's not the liar BO is. But close.
by gris2575
Tue Oct 27 2015Hillary? Polarizing? The Devil you say!
by numbah16tdhaha
Mon Oct 26 2015She's pretty clearly stated that she would be a drastic departure from her husband if elected president, showing no interest in working with Republicans and perhaps not even with her own party. To be proud of being considered arrogant and being roundly disliked by the people you're supposed to at least TRY to work with as a president is confusing to me at best. I guess naked hostility is what the voters want, seeing as they spit at each other all the fucking time.
by canadasucks
Mon Jan 28 2013I've bashed Hillary for years...I have real problems with her. But she's intelligent. She has real gifts - despite what her enemies and critics say, her tenure as sec. of state was underrated. But I've seen rational, sane people go batshite crazy with pure hatred for this woman. Look, I don't like her - but I'm talking about people babbling complete nonsense about this woman. Polarizing doesn't even begin to paint the picture. . .
by chalky
Mon Oct 20 2008I love how Hillary is on so many lists. I can keep referring to her as the disgusting anti-christ all day long. She needs a food trough.
by johnspina
Mon Apr 10 2006I am not sure she is polarizing.Even her base is not wacky for her.I was at a dinner.3liberals torched her.'Nuff said.
by sundiszno
Fri Jan 14 2005Hillary certainly is a polarizer - most people either hate her or love her, and I believe that many of those feelings are based on emotion or gut instint rather than cold logic. She is a shrewd woman, no doubt about it, and a glib talker (and I rate those as pluses), but I also think she's calculating, power-hungry, and self-serving. Not my very favorite person.
by wavebacker
Sat Dec 11 2004Abichara nailed it. Hilary Clinton is very polarizing for what she represents - a left leaning woman who is a product of the Women's Rights movements who actually has power and clout. She's someone who could really shake up the status quo in America and have us all take a hard look at what type of country we really are.
by abichara
Mon Oct 18 2004Very highly polarizing not for the policies and causes that she espouses necessarily, but rather for what she represents. Hillary seems to be a symbol for all the 1960's leftists that hold her up as something of a symbol. Even though she really isn't at all that radical, her persona comes across as rather shrill--that doesn't endear her to some elements, especially to those on the right.
by louiethe20th
Tue Sep 28 2004Like Jeff Foxworthy says,If you don't have anything nice to say you are probably talking about Hillary Clinton.
by bibliophile
Tue Sep 28 2004An intelligent woman should not be so threatening, but it is obvious she is perceived as a threat by many. So yes, she is polarizing.
by jglscd35
Tue Sep 14 2004idolized by the liberals, torched by the conservatives, most people don't have lukewarm opinions about the former first lady. many people think she will be the next president, but i don't even see her winning her party's nomination. she doesn't have one tenth of her husband's charisma, and her speaking voice sounds like nails on a blackboard.
by eschewobfuscat_ion
Tue Aug 10 2004Get ready for the four year run to the presidency. She now heads to the middle of the road, abandoning many liberal causes and constituencies in favor of a moderate senate voting record, especially after this presidential election. Demo's will have to choose between her and Edwards, as Pres/VP, but since she's older, she gets the pres title. Mark it down: Hillary for President on '08. Did someone leave a window open? UPDATE: My good friend, GoneAway, don't sell the farm, it's a long road to have no turns in it for Hillary. If you want to see the right wing mobilized for the mother of all campaign battles wait until Hill tosses her broom into the race. Sorry, I mean her hat. Even the moderate liberals cringe (and shiver) at the thought. She could have delivered the feminists for Kerry, but he opted for a pretty face with no experience, from a southern state. Too late now, though. They'll certainly take New York, California and Massachusetts, everything else is in play.
by bbutler76
Wed Aug 04 2004All you conservatives assume Kerry will lose in November and that Hillary will run in 2008. You know what they say about people who assume. At any rate, If she and Edwards were to run for the democratic nomination I would want Edwards to win. Unless all you conservatives who swear to move to another country actually do so. Than it just might worth it for Hillary to win.