REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | ladymctech (0) 03/20/2005 | I honostly don't think he did ONE thing for his team. He had NOTHING to offer. Obviously one of the worst. He's also a show-off, and a whinner.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | zuchinibut (41) 03/05/2005 | This guy had probably the single worst quality a person can have in business, and that is a lack of effort. People can make up for a lack of looks, style, or even intelligence by working hard, but a person who puts in no effort like Michael showed during one episode are absolutely not going to be successful in a business.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Maomania (1) 02/27/2005 | Why did Donald Trump use the cheap excuse that he fired Michael because he interupted one of his colleagues? He wanted him out because he did a bad job in the previous tasks, not because he interrupted (I think it was Bren)
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | mikesux (0) 02/18/2005 | michael was such an arrogant, cocky bastard. if he thinks he's the best looking on in the suite, he must have on beer goggles. he's nothing but a pudgy lazy slob who eats all day long.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Cindyo (10) 02/18/2005 | The episode where he was lazy, but had the exemption permanently hurt his image with his team and with Mr. Trump. Serves him right for abusing the exemption.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | LoneUSFullHouseFan (3) 02/10/2005 | The thing is I did in fact agree with Trump's decision, Michael was exempt and Danny should have been fired. If Magna is as smart as their degrees claim they are, however, they will never allow him to be project manager again, because he abused his power of exemption. In fact, if I was in Trump's position, I would put a condition on him saying that if he is going to abuse his power of exemption, he can no longer be a choice for project manager.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
1-6 OF 6 | View All |