| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | Dawnsdinos (6)
02/09/2005 | Just because someone does not stick to the strict party lines doesn't mean he doesn't know where he stands. He votes based on what he feels is right. That's what we need in government, not someone who tows the party line.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | irishgit (138)
02/04/2005 | Turns out that he's not so stupid after all. He seems well advised, and the doomsayers look a little disappointed.
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Skizero (13)
02/03/2005 | yes he does, he's just not a strict party-liner.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Enkidu (37)
03/08/2004 | Actually I think he has defined his position fairly well, and it's one I can live with (fiscal conservative, social moderate). The way things are in California right now the fiscal conservatism is essential, and if he performs at the same level for the next two years I'll probably vote for him (I didn't before).
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | abichara (60)
03/07/2004 | He has actually turned out to be fairly nonideological. Most of his advisors come from both Democratic and Republican camps. Generally, he was always regarded as a moderate Republican (fiscally conservative, socially moderate to liberal).
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | pabob (2)
10/17/2003 | He was not clear on the specifics at first, but philosophically he was clear. Again, I'll take my chances with that rather than stick with the status quo.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | magellan (153)
10/08/2003 | The most disturbing. I don't think anyone Democrat or Republican has any clue what we are going to get in terms of beliefs / ideology. It's all been very vague to date.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-7 OF 7 | View All |