RateItAll.com - The Opinion Network
1) Find and share opinions on anything; 2) Publish your own ratings list and share it on any site; 3) Make a little money


Tags for Eliminate second prize (Browse Tags)

Ratings Breakdown

  • 22
  • 2
  • 3
  • 5
  • 1

Hottest Topics

Hottest Weblists

Related Websites

Eliminate second prizeGet Rating Widget!

Overall Rating: 1.82 based on 33 ratings
Click here to read all Read less
(Add picture or description)

Your rating:     (Roll over your star rating, then click) (5=Great)
Notify me by email when someone comments on my review
Notify me by email when someone reviews this item

Reviews for Eliminate second prize  1-6 OF 6

Browse next item:
Feature "Survivor" in tough, American climates
Sort items by:
Jason1972 (4)
It's just as rewarding coming in 2nd during all of that brewhaha of being in the wild, so lwt there be a 1st runner up prize.

  (1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
Zarbon (0)
Oh yes, I think this would step up the competition big time. Just think, when they're down to two and one person will leave with absolutely nothing after being stuck on that dang island and the other will leave with the million. I think this would definitely create more tension between the survivors, and isn't that what we really love???

  (1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
langmodeis (0)
It is reported, everyone is awarded some form of prize money, starting with a min. of at least $2500 for the first person to go. I think winner takes all approach, would be a bad idea. Who would leave behind friends, family, jobs, etc. with the possbility of coming home EMPTY HANDED. You have to have them something for their time.

  (4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
Wiggum (17)
What better way to get people more emotionally involved that to really stiff the loser who has to endure CBS's crap for 39 days only to lose the final vote? Brilliant. But if the cast of the first Survivor is any indication, there aren't really ANY losers. Almost all the original cast members already have agents who are getting them wads of endorsement money. In the near future you're going to be buying "Rudy" brand Depends undergarments, "Sue" brand tapioca, and "Gervase" brand condoms. So what if they don't win the million? On the post-Survivor advertising circuit, they'll pick up more semi-celebrity money than Darva Conger.

  (3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
Munson (8)
It would have been too bad had Kelly not walked away with a significant second prize which ensures that the person with the best survival skills can get some big money. Otherwise, a castaway could win every single immunity challenge, but lose the vote at the final tribal council and not get paid.

  (2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
magellan (177)
I'm a big believer in the winner take all philosophy. It would make an already ruthless show even more ruthless.

  (1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree)
1-6 OF 6View All
Add a rating badge for Eliminate second prize to your site!
Add a rating badge to your site!