Stephen Donaldson

Approval Rate: 80%

80%Approval ratio

Reviews 21

Sort by:
  • by

    bluewatermonk

    Fri Oct 24 2008

    Donaldson is an author you either love or hate. There is a certain tapestry he weaves that seems to draw a defined group of people into a world of wonder, terror, loss, hope, and painful fullfillment. Maybe not the read for just anyone. I can understand why some do not see what lays beneath the written word, but, for those of you that have, it is an incredible journey through the life and history of 'The Land' that can only end with the reader wanting more.

  • by

    alanlovesdevon

    Wed Feb 28 2007

    The best writer of modern fantasy.

  • by

    kyamy3ec

    Thu Apr 13 2006

    Absolutely some of the most trying books to get into in the world. I never felt any personality in any of his characters.

  • by

    urlord

    Mon Dec 05 2005

    Once you get your head around the flawed heros of the Donaldson epics (Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, Second Chronicles, etc) you are launched into the most incredible (but at the same time very real!) worlds. Better that Tolkein at his best, if it is not sacralige to say so! For me only Tad Williams (and Tolkein of course) comes close.

  • by

    oscargamblesfr_o

    Wed Nov 30 2005

    I thought they were ok, and I liked the idea of a person being an anti-hero leper in our world, and a hero in another. The character of Drumgool owes A LOT to Gollum though.

  • by

    oberon

    Thu Jul 22 2004

    This guy writes circles around most other fantasy authors out there, including hacks like Robert Jordan. For the serious reader, let alone the serious fantasy reader, check these books out. True, they are dark and at times hard to read because of that; at times, you really hate Covenant. However, it is well worth the effort. Start with the first series, with Lord Fouls Bane. As well, if you want something a little lighter to start with, try the Mirror of Her Dreams series; it's good and a little lighter.

  • by

    jaea5759

    Sat Jun 12 2004

    HACK

  • by

    jjburns84

    Fri Jun 11 2004

    For the person who said that Donaldson's books weren't for the young, I'm young. I will agree, though, that his books are kinda heavy; they're generally not for beginning fantasy/sci-fi readers. Unlike many other fantasy/sci-fi books that concentrate almost exclusively on a defined villian and a defined hero, Donaldson's books do not potray everything as black and white; Donaldson is truly masterful in his use of gray area. In his Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, Donaldson constructs a love/hate relationship between the characters in the books and also between the reader and Thomas Covenant, the main character. I am only giving it four stars because it seems that Donaldson was pressured into following up the original trilogy with another. Even though I like the second trilogy, it probably could have been better if it had more time to be brooded over. In spite of that minor flaw, I think Stephen Donaldson shows remarkable originality and talent. Edit: The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant may... Read more

  • by

    virilevagabond

    Wed Jan 21 2004

    As far as I know, Stephen Donaldson's only contributions are the two Thomas Covenant trilogies. As other comments have accurately noted, the first three books (Lord Foul's Bane, The Illearth War, and The Power That Preserves) are exceptional, but the second trilogy is much weaker. This could be because Covenant is much more likeable in the second trilogy but also much more immaterial to the story. Also as others have noted, these books are for more mature readers. For the uninitiated, Covenant (who suffers from leprosy) is drawn into a parallel world filled with people who draw power and energy from stone and wood, those who tend magical horses, lost seafaring Giants, restless trees and their shepherding forestals, sleepless and deathless super warriors (the Bloodguard), and benevolent Lords who lead them all and fight to preserve all that is good but are slightly obsessed with the failures of their ancestors. Opposing the powers of good are lorewise ur-viles, brutish cavewrights,... Read more

  • by

    pro_christian

    Wed Oct 08 2003

    The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant: The Unbeliever are simply brilliant! His anti-hero with leprosy is deftly crafted!

  • by

    nolfie

    Sun May 25 2003

    Lovely. The first three is slightly better than the last three. Therefore I couldn't give it 5 stars. Read it and enrich your life slightly.

  • by

    zebadee

    Sun Apr 20 2003

    The first chronicles of Thomas Covenant are quite good but the second trilogy is abismal

  • by

    jms53079

    Sat Apr 12 2003

    The 6 books in the Thomas Covenant series are still some of my favorites. I really enjoyed the hero as anti-hero aspect of the story.

  • by

    chuck5012

    Sun Nov 03 2002

    The first Gold Ring Bearer was great, but then it went down hill to a point why do we can about Thomas Covenant

  • by

    mindboggle

    Sun Mar 25 2001

    Wonderful stories and rich enthralling characters.

  • by

    sensei

    Mon Mar 05 2001

    I agree completely with everything you say engr9519om with one exception - his rating does suffer 4 instead of 5 as punishment for a poor second trilogy. Cash in - perhaps - maybe the theme just ran out of puff. I read these in my 30's and before David Eddings. Influenced opinion perhaps?

  • by

    vamptaylor

    Mon Dec 11 2000

    Terrible in my opinion, but all things deserve a 2nd chance. I did read LORD FOUL'S BANE a few years back (I think I was 13), now that I'm 21 perhaps I should read it again before I cast my final opinion. I'll get back to you on this one.

  • by

    engr9519om

    Wed Aug 09 2000

    The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant: The Unbeliever (first trilogy) were wonderful. Thomas Covenant, the compelte anti-hero: the man you love to hate and hate to love. I read these books in the late 1970's / early 1980's ... still they haunt me. Love 'em. The second trilogy in the set (The Wounded Land, The One Tree, & White Gold Wielder) seem to be written more to cash in on the first trilogy rather than out of a driving passion to write in the fantasy genra. So, overall, the firt three rate a 6+ but the last three at best a 3 ... I just loved the first three so much that I had to give him an overall rating of 5

  • by

    erik9389om

    Sat Aug 05 2000

    Could be hare for some. Had to re-read them after some years befor I could appriciate them.

  • by

    none7686om

    Thu Jun 22 2000

    I think that Donaldson gets a bad rap because he writes perhaps a little too deep for the average fantastical taste. However, he is a master storyteller who writes very intelligently. I believe that he is the most underrated author in Fantasy. I didn't understand him until I got older, so he is not a writer for the young, but he is still a master nonetheless.

  • by

    wren2372om

    Thu Dec 02 1999

    The six Wounded Land books were the longest, most boring books I have ever read. Would never read anything else by him.

This topic is on the following list(s)

Add to new list