CanadaSucks 02/22/2009
I had a terrific and funny High School teacher who said it best- James Buchanan is the only president from Pennsylvania. . .and we aren't proud of him.I know a few small historical anecdotes. . .but in summation it seems that everything this guy touched wilted.
Helpful
Funny
Agree
Disagree
jr1990 12/10/2008
Worst President in our nation's history. The guy was horrible.
irishgit 10/31/2008
A strong case can be made for this guy as the worst president in history. With the country lurching from crisis to crisis, and plodding with grim but unsteady steps towards civil war, he and his administration did precisely nothing. Hell of a way to discharge the oath of office.
Chalky 10/31/2008
James Buchanan was actually the only president who never married. I learned that off of an old re-run of 'Welcome Back Kotter.' All the sweathogs went to Buchanan High if you didn't know already.
3232330 05/24/2007
Not strong or forceful said session was wrong but keeping those states in the Union was wrong also.
bogoshipper 03/24/2007
Just because he was gay doesnot mean he was bad.
GenghisTheHun 02/20/2007
He could have done more. He let the country slide into chaos. He generally was bad news although the situation was probably hopeless.
billyguns2 12/13/2006
There is only one U.S. president worse than Buchanan, and that is George W. Bush. Buchanan should have been tried for treason; there is no doubt his slave-owner sympathies and inaction brought on the calamitous U.S. Civil War.
dixie1202 05/03/2006
He should definately be ranked below average because of incompetent crisis leadership but I'm not as hard on him as most historians. He tried his best to keep the union together during his term and avoid a horrible war. He was a lame duck when the first states seceeded. He was unsure of Lincoln's intentions and the public was not overwhelmingly in favor of the war prior to Ft. Sumter. A pre-emptive strike could have caused all of the border states to seceed and make the task nearly impossible for Lincoln.
Ih8rateitall 03/11/2006
Who?
Mr_know_It_All 12/11/2005
this is my government project on james buchanan and i want to know if u guy/girls think it is "A" quality Less than average president ( James Buchanan ) The only president who never married, Buchanan was almost 66 years old when he succeeded his presidency. He was president when the fight over slavery began. President Buchanan was a prominent figure in American political life for nearly half a century, holding some of the nation's highest offices. With his diplomatic experience, Buchanan also became involved with foreign policy in the Senate, eventually chairing the Foreign Relations Committee. By the end of his ten terms in the senate, he was one of the most powerful senators in Congress. At the Democratic convention in 1856, Buchanan won the presidential nomination on the 17th ballot. In the fall he won an electoral victory, although he failed to get a popular majority over John C. Fremont, the Republican, and Millard Fillmore. Millard Fillmore was known as the know nothing candidate. Two days after Buchanan's inauguration, the Supreme Court declared in the Dred Scott case that Congress had no power over slavery in the territories. With his long experience in diplomacy, Buchanan expected his administration to conduct a vigorous foreign policy. He fought to extend American influence in the Caribbean, but congressional opposition forced him to give up efforts to purchase Cuba from Spain. Never the less, domestic matters intruded upon his attention. The panic of 1857 added to the unpopularity of his administration and contributed to heavy Democratic losses in the congressional elections of 1858.Buchanan's reputation is judged mainly by his conduct during the last months of his presidency, and he is therefore generally regarded as an ineffective executive. In his defense it can be said that he was a lame-duck president caught in a vicious crossfire between secessionists and Republicans. But at the same time his devotion to a conservative legislator led him to narrow his powers with an original constitutional crisis. Many issues divided the nation, but slavery was the main cause of argument. Buchanan personally was against slavery. But as President he quoted that the Constitution protected slavery and that the laws must be obeyed. When 7 of the 15 slave states left the nation in 1860, Buchanan refused to use force to hold them in the Union. He hoped they would grow discouraged and return to the Union. I think Buchanan wasn’t much for aggression mainly because he wouldn’t use force to keep the South in the Union. That started the Civil War and that’s how Abraham Lincoln got elected. A lot of people blame him for the Civil War and I would have to agree. He was the one to have them depart from the Union. Plus The Civil War was the most destructive in U.S. history and that’s probably why most historians look down on him.
Chagoth 07/28/2005
Writer Christopher Buckley said it best, The Greatness That Was the Buchanan Era included Dred Scott, the economic panic of 1857, secession, and Fort Sumter. You have to look hard to find four more dismal nodes in American history. Open the Buchanan file to any random page and you'll find such accolades as: never regarded as a brilliant speaker, neither a brilliant nor visionary thinker, and even expelled from college. Ouch!
GOPmember76 07/18/2005
Think stating that one person or one factor started the Civil War is an oversimplification. Still, Buchanan was an inadequate administrator and president.
Mr. Democratic 04/30/2005
He tried his best to keep America out of war, I don't think that's wrong or bad at all.
kipprabbit 03/06/2005
simply ineffective
James76255 02/24/2005
The most do nothing president the U.S. has ever had. Was more interested in himself than he was doing anything for the country. The pompous twit actually declared himself the last President of the United States at one point, apparently feeling that the Union would fall to the CSA. I don't know if he was gay or not, and I have no idea why some people feel the need to paint everyone in history as potentially gay, but I do know he was not a good president, gay or straight.
geog84 01/23/2005
For those of us who went to school, the south started the civil war, not Buchanan. Although he was a democrat, he was not a bad president
bsd987 11/04/2004
Not the worst, but close there to. Did nothing, and thus he'll recieve nothing. He wrote a book defending his presidency. I would have read it, but I really don't want to read about his defending what he did not do.
CSACrusader 09/15/2004
He was from PA. And he wasn't named Bush. That makes him O.K. in my book.
Democratic Patriot 09/15/2004
MUCH better than W. I don't care if he was gay.
alpepper 08/22/2004
America's Neville Chamberlain. Did nothing to avert the Civil War (maybe he was too busy packin' Da Fudge). Pity that he was Pennsylvania's only president. Frank Rizzo would have been a better President.
andyjay 08/19/2004
A moral and diplomatic failure. There might not have been a Civil War if he had acted strongly. Yes, he was our worst president.
John McCain 06/27/2004
Really caused the Civil War.
tatef87 06/11/2004
does anybody know this guy??
bellevueboy4 04/20/2004
Superb leader, paved the way for the Civil War which he left Lincoln to clean up. If we had Liberalism like Buchanan's still rife in the world we would be able to sort our conquests out much quicker. Didn't have a wife, interesting.
rjmst80 04/02/2004
All in all an ineffective leader, but liberals make like the fact that he is considered the first homosexual president. There are several documented stories about his long-term relationship with Senator Rufus King of Alabama. In fact, they were known in some circles as Miss Nancy and Aunt Fancy.
gopman79 03/16/2004
Horrible... putrid... I could go on for days with adjectives about this president, some even that I can't say on this site. Along with all his panic policies and his constant brown nosing towards the south, he also was the first president without a wife, and add all that together, you have the worst president of all time.
ldave_x 02/24/2004
Much better then dubya.
Redoedo 06/07/2003
James Buchanan was elected President just as the bloodshed in Kansas was raging and the nation was on its way to Civil War. He made no secret of his feelings on slavery- he believed it to be a states' rights issue. His predacessor had made the same mistake, and lives were lost because of it. (1)Crisis Leadership: 1 out of 5 stars- Buchanan was just another one of those Presidents in the 1850s who did nothing to stop the war. His narrow-minded views on slavary brought us even closer to Civil War. The battle raged in Kansas, and Buchanan, in a narrow-minded move, begged Congress for Kansas's admission as a slave state. This failed and the issue of slavery in Kansas would not be resolved until 1861, when it was admitted as a free state. He also sided with the South when he offered a reward for the capture of John Brown, a black abolishionist who had been murdering pro-slavery advocates in the South. Brown's execution angered Northerners everywhere. The South, also was angered because it showed that the North was willing to end slavery by murder and bloodshed. The President did nothing to appease the North, simply because he was fearful of provoking the South. (2)Diplomatic Relations: 2 out of 5 stars- Buchanan continued the efforts of Pierce to annex Cuba, but was blocked by outcry from abolishionists. He did however, manage to warn the British off from pursuing its interest in Central America. However, due to the conflict at home, he was unable to stop the conflicts in the Rio Grande Valley, where Mexicans were still killing American settlers. (3)Economic Management: 2 out of 5 stars- Much due to the actions of his predacessor, the economy had fallen into a recession and continued to do so throughout Buchanan's term. (4)Vision For the Country:1 out of 5 stars- Buchanan had absolutely no vision for this nation. His Presidency, like that of his predacessors, simply marked another stepping stone towards war. His Presidency marked a period in which the South was appeased and the North basically ignored. (5)Morality/Popularity:1 out of 5 Stars- He was extremely unpopular when he left office. His behind the scenes dealings with the Supreme Court helped influence their decision in the Dred Scott Case. He also sought to again appease the south in the John Brown Rebellion and by pleading with the Congress that Kansas be admitted as a slave state. [Final Score: 1.4] In the final analysis, Buchanan simply stood by and while making efforts to appeal the South, alienated the North and further divided this country and brought it to the doorstep of Civil War.
jack man 03/03/2003
one
ggobs 02/18/2003
He did nothing but put off the enetible
Comrade 02/01/2002
Tough tim to be president. Did his bet. Love that Ostend Manifesto!
Alucard 12/13/2001
The only thing that kept me from rateing him a 1 is that he hung a man while in office. That took some balls with plublic image
scarlatti84 06/16/2001
"He never did anything to harm this nation." I saw that in one comment. Answer--he did plenty. Probably the worst president (and has been rated so by scholars) his arrogance and foolishness crippled the country. Firstly, we have the Panic of 1857--a panic for the North and not the South, which he did nothing to end, which served to cripple the unity of the country. Secondly, we have the Dred Scott Decision which Buchanan tried illegally to influence form the White House. Thirdly, we have his standby leadership when the Union was crumbling. Although he was in a tough spot, Buchanan could have done SOMETHING. By far a scholarly and intelliegtn man, he was ineffective and weak as a president and chosen unenthusiastically by the Democrats as a candidate in 1857 with "nothing on him."
clover38 03/18/2001
I agree with abichara, not a good leader.
BigJJ 02/08/2001
Should have been neutered.
abichara 11/23/2000
A president is supposed to be a leader; Buchanan was not. His main goal was to appease the South, a leader does not appease, he tells the nation what has to be done in bad times. One of the worst presidents.
sros5462om 03/27/2000
He didn't particularly do anything wrong during his tenure. In fact, he is a member of a small fraternity of presidents that have been elected to multiple terms (not that such is a prerequisite for greatness). Nonetheless, he never robbed Americans of their liberties or their Constitution. He oppossed Southern succession, but he (correctly) assumed that he didn't have any Constitutional right to prevent such action. While he doesn't deserve a full four stars, I will grant him this to counter the rather unfair lower ratings.
Ruby 03/23/2000
Left the country in shambles for Lincoln.
39 reviews! « Previous | Page of 1 | Next »
Sort by Newest Oldest Most helpful Least helpful Highest rated Lowest rated