dumontaaron55
member since 12/26/2007
User Votes: 12 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 1 Disagree
RSS Icon

Activity for dumontaaron55

1061 days ago

Here it is. District 9. After every single action movie called the 'BEST MOVIE EVAR!' by some slobbery prepubescent fanboy circle. After the alright Dark Knight and above average Iron Man. After the well-crafted but hysterical "look at this explosion! look at this shiny object!" Star Trek. After the conceptually fantastic but overposed and over-Americanized Watchmen, et cetera, ad nauseum.

Then, very rarely, there is a defining movie, one made right from the dirtpit of selling out---District 9, a creative alternate history where aliens land onto Earth in 1982 with all sorts of difficulties, conflicts, rages and an eventual mini-apocalypse, fits in here. It's a complex, knowing work; the first noticeable thing District 9 does (apart from blending faux-documentary footage with fiction) is avoiding the cliche obsession with an exotic sense of geography and landmarks in many other alien movies--this one starts itself off in a poor, poverty-stricken Africa, and the movie effortlessly spends its remainder both wrenching you and avoiding all other cliches and stereotypes possible--here, for example, the aliens are the good guys, and the heartless ones are ourselves. And though it remains realistic and firmly embedded in disillusionment, it is still something with multiple interpretations--a study on a dying, corrupt government, a portrait of the direct, most visceral decay of humanity, a deconstruction and liberation of today's strained social architecture, a statement on the ignorance of culture and a prediction of its end, and, most obviously, an allegory on racism. But throughout this heavy political baggage, pathos and tragedy, and difficult confrontations and reflections of our own world, District 9 is truly a fun, whirlwind ride into a human descent--from the go-getter visions of the spaceship hovering over the African slums to the marvelous, beautifully dry and suncaked images of the camps and aliens, the hyperreal anti-colors and stylistic strayings mark both the decline of economics, morals and compassion in the world after the alternate-historical arrival and of the daring narrative experimentation.

District 9 throws you straight into an endlessly wild dirtpit of social, political, emotional and moral chaos---beneath all the layers of endless action, aliens, spaceships, et cetera, the movie is a sprawling, meticulously scattered statement on just about the entire modern world and the 21st Century today--an incorporation and reconciliation of all the grief, tragedy, conflicts, ideas and diversity, District 9 even still never goes sour or bloated or plain incomprehensible, and it remembers that emotions and poetry, no matter how blunt, stark or savage they are, are still most important. And its ending--a crash-and-burn shootout followed by a documentary-style series of interviews and nostalgic "footage" from the past--is a final grasp for rejoice, a settling of all the dust and thorns gradually picked up more and more in this blistering, world reordering strait. The last two shots--one of Vicus' wife holding a metal-made flower and of an alien creating that very flower--aren't of any pandering, artificial cliffhanger-like sentiments (unlike many other blockbusters of today); those moments are one last optimistic suggestion of hope and peace and after the damage, apocalypse and disturbance. People can maybe embrace each other after all. That's where this movie makes its mark.

Add your Vote:

Votes on this review: 4 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

1069 days ago

"I have a magic trick to show you," says the Joker in The Dark Knight, right before he takes out a pencil and drives it in to a bodyguard's face.
This scene sums up the looming sense of terror in the movie or, more precisely, the attempt of a looming sense of terror. After the hype, as rigid as The Dark Knight's surface is, the movie doesn't quite pass for much more than a two-and-a-half hour-long series of poses and charades. As incredibly beautiful and wild as they are it's difficult to make a magic trick when you're being too obvious, and it's difficult to make a joke when you're being too obscure.
In my view, it's too easy to label The Dark Knight a masterpiece. A masterpiece of what? Of action? Of suspense? It's more responsible to call it a work of new-found maturity and sophistication, but I'm still not getting the whole picture. Maybe I'm an idiot. Or maybe it's just a children's comic-book movie that wishes to be more. So, while it is honorable that this movie is taking a kind of artistic leap of faith, it's solemnized to death and drowned in a vat of pessimism. It is reality-distanced culture, and (worst of all) offers unenlightening "questions" and "observations" ad nauseum.
What worked was the movie's attempt to illuminate the flaws in its heroes those saviours of the screen that, in some respects, are our modern,near-mythical figures. In this way, the movie stood true to its own philosophy. For that, I give it respect.
All the feral dynamics that the movie is so well-praised for don't seem tobe more than second-rate. The politics are dress-up. The complexity of the city is blunted into the realm of foggy, somewhat-monotonous markers, blueprints and wasted-away commercial aesthetics (note the stylish-but-little-else car scenes between all the queasy monologues, and the 'fashionable' dark-azure tints, bleeding city lights and sledgehammer-composed skyline shots). While poetic, this treatment is little more than an abstraction .. It alienates viewers from the movie's center and its creative structure.
However, I won't deny that, at parts, this movie gets to a haunting standpoint. There is visible inspiration and more of an open mindedness to new genres and styles. It comes across in places as feverish, even Sirkian melodrama. In many ways, this movie is an updated thriller, adapted to new forms and texture. It is more fast-paced and comparable to the whirring, unwieldy, surface-obsessed 'Brave New World', as Aldous Huxley put it. Even so, The Dark Knight does trip and stumble when juggling all these parts, and it slips between a Frankenstein mesh and epic ensemble. It many ways this movie is a glorious, incredible, highly fascinating mess ..
For all the Biblical resonance and inferno-like, scorching moral plays in tertwined through this grim trip, it's not without all its pop-mythology excess and pseudo-sophistication. It turns into a psychopathic, sugar-induced, one-note daze at times. All the artistry of the movie plays second fiddle to the premeditated, calculated and preachy aspects. Though the chaos, havoc and anti-city ideology isn't a stroke from the heart like one would expect it to be, it's all much more sing-song and a bit drained than memory would have one believe.
The Dark Knight can be pretentious and simplistic at the same time, which is too bad. The attempt was highly admirable and ambitious, though. All of the eye-popping, hallucinatory urban decay (visually, thematically and metaphorically) was impressive, but at moments it came across as thinly veiled and shallow. It's a masterpiece of smoke and mirrors and a few dimes more. This movie is exhilarating to anticipate, but almost-but-not-quite-there when experienced.

Add your Vote:

Votes on this review: 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 1 Disagree

1679 days ago

MTV's Fear had a different connection to scary TV. It was unlike fiction shows like Twin Peaks, or The X-Files, or The Twilight Zone, because 'Fear' was real. It was unlike other real shows, like Unsolved Mysteries, or Most Haunted, because it didn't have paranormal 'experts', or stories, because it dared average Joes to face these horrors. It was also groundbreaking in a way, being one of the first game shows to use night vision, or having contestants lurk deep into haunted locations, without fifty cameramen with giant cameras and mics following them. This show was scary because it was real, and dealt with everyday people.

Add your Vote:

Votes on this review: 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

1679 days ago

Twin Peaks is one of the greatest TV shows of all-time, on top of being one of the scariest. Twin Peaks was a surrealist-neo-noir, courtesy of Mr. David Lynch. It revolved around Laura Palmer's death and Agent Cooper. Talking logs, dwarves speaking backwards, surreal, dreamlike sequences, it had it all. After the show was cut by the network, instead of finally resolving all of the darkness of happy-go-lucky Twin Peak city, Lynch decided to get his revenge on the network by making the final episode leaving more fantastically unsettling cliffhangers and questions than any other thing in the history of anything of ever.

Add your Vote:

Votes on this review: 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

1679 days ago

Ghostwatch was a made-for-TV-horror-drama that kicked off BBC's Halloween of '92. The show was terrifyingly realistic, maybe even a little too realistic. In fact, it caused slight pandemonium in the UK after people thought it was for real, before unfairly labeling it a hoax after they were wrong, but it was actually just a sophisticated masterpiece, not unlike 'The War Of The Worlds'. The show was utterly terrifying, and definitely deserves a spot in the Horror Hall Of Fame.

Add your Vote:

Votes on this review: 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

1679 days ago

Back in 2002, Chris Morris decided he wanted to make an adaptation of his radio series, Blue Jam. His TV adaptation is thickly laced with jet black comedy and all sorts of sick, twisted humour, and its dark, unsettling and very chilling atmosphere created a whole new kind of creepy. All of the gritty, surrealist and neo-noirish sketches that were produced were in some kind of way scary, but perhaps the creepiest was the dismemberment and disposal, via a smoking, drinking, criminal, cussing... six-year-old girl.

Add your Vote:

Votes on this review: 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree
By the Numbers