wikipedia is a problem. I am not
trying to be some ungrateful jerk by attacking this but instead a
detector of crap. Wikipedia was a good idea in theory but became like
all things supposedly aiming to be democratic: dictatorial. The
founder(s) of wikipedia had a great idea but it became, not an
encyclopedia but instead, an instrument for propaganda and a false
form of information. See, the problem with wikipedia is that it has a
hierarchy that is not completely, how'd you say, neutral. Read an
article about socialism(or rights) and it is like reading a piece of
propaganda for socialism, wile capitalism's article is more of a in
theory it works but here is criticism and more criticism. Check
out the wikiquote for capitalism and socialism, there is a big
difference in the amount of criticism each page has. The biggest
piece of crap that wikipedia does is its goal to both be ignorant and
turn a blind eye to ignorance. They use fallacies of logic such as
strategic word usage in order to convey one side of a political
issue. One good example is how they use words such as progressive
and rights in clearly a one sided and BS manner. I know a lot
of you atheist out there who art of the cult of science (i.e. You
blindly support a form of secularism and squelch any opposition even
if science proves you wrong) think that labelling something like the
Young Earth belief as pseudo-science is unbiased, but it is in fact
very biased. Calling religion fake science is just some stupid
atheist way of not thinking and blindly following their own prophets
(charles darwin, karl marx, and peter singer [their names don't
deserve to be capitalized]).
Another thing about wikipedia is that it
lacks any true value in society. When you use a real encyclopedia for
research you get two things (usually): 1, clear words; and 2, a long
enough article for you to understand something about the subject.
Wikipedia seems to have a bunch of arrogant administrators and
arrogant inner-circle editors. wikipedia has neither of those two things.
My lastish argument is this: what is
the point of wikipedia? Before wikipedia there was something called
GNE (recursive acronym for GNE is Not an Encyclopedia) that
never really got anywhere because of wikipedia. The idea was smart:
have a repository of information that is appropriate but can be
anything (no scumbag editors dumping new articles because they go
against their personal beliefs). It was a repository where you could
actually explain stuff in English and you could go in-depth, not some
worthless scan-over like wikipedia. If you want the truth instead of
a horridly abridged subjective lie then make a GNE-like thing or cry.
try to make a page about Libertarian Wiki and it will be deleed
within three days. More info about wikipedia is:
(here)
(here)
oh and one last thing: the wikipedia
article about Fascism is BS. fascism is not nazism. nazism is an
ideology that combined atheistic and animalistic views on humans wile
contradicting itself with non animalistic freedoms especially in
economics. Fascism is an ideology that stresses the view that humans
are conscience, sentient, non instinct-relient beings but that there
are times when the opportunity benefit outweighs the opportunity cost
when it comes to harmful acts (there is more to this than that simple
sentence). because of that fascism is much like a safer version
capitalism and wikipedia is wrong and is lying to millions!