Mick Jagger

So Jagger is "ugly" on account of having big lips? Well, I always heard THAT was considered a rather "sexy" feature, .. . what "full sensuous lips" or even "dick suckin lips"?! I mean, Pamela Anderson has those kinde of lips too, .. yet nobody ever calls HER "ugly",.. on the contrary, everybody agrees that she's one "hot babe" ( well, except maybe jealous bitches )!! Go figuer ?!! As for Jaggers being "skinny", hell, I've personaly always kinde prefered the slender look with guys. Never really went for the really big, beefy, burly, husky, weight lifting, steroid munching, football jock type physique with breasts larger than most chicks I know myself. I guess thats just me though, what els can I say ?

Back in the 60s, the Stones were known as "the ugliest band in Britain." They haven't aged well, particularly Jagger and Richards with their "ridden hard and put up wet" look.

I personally, don't think he was that good looking when he was younger... But time hasn't been his friend either.... I can't understand how he's getting chicks younger than me.... never mind I know....just scary what and who people will do for money and fame....

mick jagger is beautiful! im a female in my 20s and i find the young and old mick jagger very attractive. i dont understand you tasteless people who think he's ugly?? despite his sexiness, he has very nice facial features, and an amazing body figure! theres absolutely nothing ugly about him. every part of him looks really good!

UGLY for Mick Jagger's face is a Giant under Statement----His Facial Expressions---His Lips and his body movements really make me cringeeeeeeee!! The thought of his stick body and the head that's attached to it is Vile----What a terriably Uglyyyyyyyy man!!!!

Well, he is one of those exmaples of men, where you can see: uglyness doesnt make women run away from you)) He is extremely ugly and he gets all those beautiful women. Well, maybe hes got a great personality? But I quess its the fact that he is a rock singer, famous and rich.

Resembles an aging Curious George.

My  biggest thing about him is not really his mouth,I mean he is just generally not very good looking,he has a waistline that even I evny. When I think about all the groupies this dude has had it really makes me laugh.

With those lips he could suck a golf ball through a garden hose

Personally, if I was his age, having lived his life the way he has, I wouldn't expect to look as good.

Given his high profile status (being knighted and all that jazz), Mick Jagger really sets the gold standard for ugly musicians. Nevertheless, as other comments have noted, infamous lips and ratty hair simply have no bearing when it comes to the inexplicable attention Jagger gets from the groupies. A poster-child for the alpha male effect, (now Sir) Michael Philip Jagger was born on Jul 26, 1943 in Dartford, Kent, England.

he is not that bad looking but he has never been short on the gal pals. richer than most of us will ever be. so guess he has no complaints.

"Anything worth doing is worth overdoing." -Mick Jagger When I was in Yellowknife last year, Mick's brother Chris Jagger was in town for a weekend playing in some fairly-decent bluegrass band. Now I'm sure most people have never even heard of Chris Jagger before, but in Yellowknife he made the front page of the newspaper just for making an appearance. I saw him play at The White Fox. He had obviously stolen a couple of his brother's shirts; not to mention mannerisms. I was less than ecstatic at his performance, but those Yellowknifers love folky, twangey jam sessions. So Chris fit in pretty darn well. Now this was where I saw how famous and cool Mick Jagger really is: In the middle a song, Chris went out into the dancefloor and cut in between a 8/10 blonde, and her boyfriend, who was easily the biggest guy in the club. This guy looked like he could break a Jagger in half like a twig, but instead he turned around and gave everyone else a double-thumbs-up. He had a dopey sta... Read more

For a guy without a lot of good looks,Jagger has had more poontang than a truckload of good looking guys.Being a famous Rock singer has it's perks!(Also,he's rumored to have other "assets" that make other guys jealous).

Creepy to be sure, but he's been around so long and is such a cultural icon I don't even think about his looks in the same way I might if he were an average guy. In fact, he's so distinctively different he falls into a category that can't really be appropriately judged by the usual critera. At least, that's how he affects me.

And he really can't sing either but he has what it takes to front a high profile rock band which makes him sexy to some..(though Im not one of them!)

Rock stars are the only people with groupies that don't seem to care how outrageously butt ugly they are. Why is that?

Hey, I'll takes his looks, his money and women. For me it sure beats being broke, horny and twice as ugly.

With all due respect to IgnatiusJReilly, I don't think Jagger ever did an enormous amount of drugs, even during the swingin' 60's. He came into those looks without any artificial stimuli. Keith, on the other hand, used to look fairly normal (at least to me) until he started doing massive quantities of heroin and morphed into Kharis the Mummy. One of the things that always kept me from trying heroin, even during my days of youthful indulgence, was seeing what it did to the physiognomies of people like Keith, Iggy Pop, Dee Dee Ramone, Johnny Thunders, etc. Heroin addicts never seem to age well (that is, if they live long enough to age at all).