Carole King
While the landmark album Tapestry earned her superstar status, singer/songwriter Carole King had already ...
Approval Rate: 80%
Reviews 49
by gangdalton
Fri Mar 08 2013Tapestry alone and those songs on top of all she has ever done. What female artist out there was one of the original driving forces of early Rock and Roll and moved forward like Carol king? Just another rediculous bypass.
by lanford412
Mon Nov 12 2012Pa-leaze
by swannsong
Tue Nov 06 2012The Queen of Kings
by ferenc
Mon Oct 01 2012Need to say more about this woman? It's a shame she's not already in the hall of fame what makes this whole hall of fame a joke. Singer, songwriter. Great pianoplayer and admired by millions and millions because of her music. Not just music.. GREAT MUSIC!!!!!!!! Shame on you!!! By the way... same counts for the carpenters..
by catch23
Tue Jul 03 2012She is a fine songwriter but aside from her landmark Tapestry and a number of memorable hit singles, but as a performer not really Hall material
by youtoo
Thu Dec 29 2011King of Pop
by t4too8d9
Fri Oct 21 2011so far away
by unific
Thu Oct 20 2011hall of fame songwriter with one outstanding LP
by takemehome1024
Fri Dec 17 2010She's already in as a non-performer, did not stand out too much as a performer
by ralphthewonder_llama
Fri Dec 17 2010Nice Jewish girl who is the greatest female hit machine in rock. Her career spans nearly the entire history of rock & roll: her first hit was in 1961, just six years after Rock Around the Clock became a hit. I keep reading about her not being "deserving" of live performance status. Do I detect a smidgen of male chauvinism here?
by suthernfryd
Wed Jun 30 2010It's a tapestry that she's not in.
by jester002
Sun May 02 2010Carole had an amazing talent and to play piano at such a young age was astounding. I still own an original copy of the Tapestry album and although I don't listen to it in order to preserve the vinyl, I still enjoy listening to her on cd.
by maryadalittle
Sun Mar 28 2010Carol, you got a friend
by take403
Tue Mar 09 2010If you have Carole King's Greatest Hits, then you already know not all the songs on there are from Tapestry. Yes, Tapestry was/is a great album but she had other hits and her soundtrack album Really Rosie also sold well (thanks to her music and Maurice Sendak's stories set to music). Another hit she had was "Hard Rock Cafe," which is also not on Tapestry. My point is, as a performer, she most definitely deserves the honor.
by jollyolstnick
Sun Dec 06 2009One great album and a hand full of classic songs. Does not a fall make. As a writer YES.
by fitman
Fri Nov 13 2009Not my favorite performer, but why not?
by trarymavers
Tue Oct 27 2009i great LP
by lindy3953
Tue Aug 04 2009Maybe based on her songwriting (which she is already in for). But absolutely NOT for her performing.
by lagirlvt
Fri Jul 03 2009I went to the New York annex of the RRHOF today, and was shocked beyond belief that Patti Smith and Chritina Aguilara are in the HOF but Carole King is not. So many artists who got where they are by standing on Carole King's (and Gerry Goffin's) shoulders are in, but she is not. I mean, really, Madonna but not Carole King?! Patti LaBelle (no disrespect to her at all) but not Carole King?! I am going to look into how this could be, and start the process for her to get this recognition. I mean, she has been writing songs that other people made famous since the 1960's....she GAVE "You've Got a Friend" to her good friend, James Taylor in the early '70's when they were performing with their other good friend Joni Mitchell at the Troubador in L.A.....she GAVE it to him and suggested that he put it out as a single. This alone should earn her a place in the HOF.....she's a giant and she's one of the most talented singer/songwriters of my generation. This is a travesty and needs to be corrected... Read more
by devasic1
Thu Apr 23 2009Tapestry is one of the most important albums ever released in popular music as well as one of the most popular. She didn't burn out after either like many think. She had two more number 1 albums and a handful of other gold selling records too. Being in as a Songwriter in the 60s is not giving Ms. King enough respect!
by guardianangel
Sun Mar 22 2009after Neil Diamond
by moose74
Wed Jun 25 2008It is beyond bizarre that she is not in the HOF as a performer. "Tapestry" was a watershed album. "So Far Away", "I Feel the Earth Move" and "It's Too Late" were all great songs, not to mention "Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow?"; she also co-wrote and has performed "You've Got a Friend" and "Up on the Roof." A voice with soul and heart. What's left to discuss?
by madeincanada
Mon Apr 07 2008it's too late, baby
by sheasley
Wed Dec 26 2007Carol Kings writing is fantastic and her arrangements are definitely first rate. She deserves to be in the hall of fame.
by marathonmannjo_4
Sun Sep 30 2007This is one of the bigest travesties -- "Tapestry" paved the way for all of the singer-songwriters who followed.
by eddiecook
Fri May 25 2007Sure. Why not?
by caspery
Sat Apr 07 2007Pros: Tapestry was a landmark album. Cons: She's already in the Hall Of Fame as a songwriter, which therefore includes her writing credits on her own recordings. Most of recording career is passable.
by wuzupdee
Tue Mar 27 2007all my life's a tapestry
by beentalkingjes_us
Fri Mar 16 2007ur already in the hall as a song writer
by ma_duron
Wed Feb 14 2007She and Gerry Goffin were inducted together for their songwriting into 1) the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and 2) the Songwriter's Hall of Fame.
by maplerock
Sat Jan 27 20071 great album, several good songs. A terrific writer.
by waitsfan
Tue Jan 16 2007Carole King is a musical idol of mine. Though that is mainly her songwriting, she deserves entry for Tapestry alone, and much more for all she's written and performed before and since. Style, grace, and substance personified.
by tenoften
Sun Dec 24 2006Gee I thought she was already in it!
by dennyd
Sat Sep 09 2006She was a significant hit-maker at the start of RR, as song co-writer with Jerry Geoffin in the Brill Building, and later an equily talented preformer/song writer, of imense popularity and appeal. Her impact was felt both ways, and it's hard to believe that at this point we are only talking about her induction. It's not TOO Late Baby....
by boromax
Tue Jul 18 2006OK. Inducting James Taylor (for example) without inducting Carole King is just WRONG!
by magoo3985
Thu Apr 27 2006Tough one because she is already in as a songwriter. Tapestry is a masterpiece, bu I'm guessing the Hall put her in as a songwriter, so they wouldn't have to induct her as an artist.
by marto04e
Sun Mar 12 2006she was mpore of a songwriter than a singer. she is already in for beeing a songwriter
by molfan
Sat Mar 04 2006she has been contributing to the music industry since she was a teenager, singing and most of all song writer. what she has not sung herself has provided other singers with some good songs. she should have that honor if she already did not.
by musfan
Fri Dec 30 2005By ‘Rock and Roll’ hall of fame, I believe they mean popular music in general as from memory Nat Cole was inducted. Carole is a genius, sure everyone says that about their favourite artists but she influenced the Beatles. They amongst Bing Crosby and Ella Fitzgerald and Dusty Springfield and others have covered her songs. Her Tapestry album became the biggest seller on the planet back in 1971. It aided her in winning the Grammy grand slam (a feat NO one has equalled) and its success was the whole reason the platinum award was introduced by the RIAA. Her success continued after that too. She has a great voice – just cause you can’t hit the notes Whitney can doesn’t mean you can’t sing a song. Also she is one of the greatest piano players of the rock era (arrangers too). As a man her non-inclusion as a perfumer reeks of sexism.
by urethramiacin
Wed Dec 28 2005she made me feel like a natural woman
by oh_neil
Fri Dec 16 2005You folks who don't think she should be in as a performer obviously do not know that Tapestry alone should be the reason she should be in-it is a masterpiece -never mind the hit albums that followed. It is a travesty of a Rock and Roll Hall of Fame that does not include her as a perfomer-there are already many lesser talents in as performers-making it the Rock and Roll Hall of Shame!
by c_girl
Fri Dec 16 2005She is so amazing I love her voice. She should definately be recognized as a performer.
by elvisc
Sun Dec 04 2005She is already in as a writter. Tapastry was not influential enough to get her in as a musician.
by amazingeee
Sat Dec 03 2005Her solo career is impressive enough for her induction as a performer, despite already (deservedly) being in as a non-performer. Tapestry was a massive success both artistically and commercially.
by garjen55
Wed Nov 30 2005Gerry Goffin and Carole King are in as a non-performers (for their songwriting), but so many people want her voted in as a performer, because it was in her performing years (when Tapestry was released) that she was writing by herself.
by habs10
Tue Nov 29 2005Great, great songwroter and should be in for that alone. tapesty is icing on the cake, but most folks only know here from her records, not her first career as a writer as the cream of with the Brill Building song-scribers.
by diamond_dave
Sun Nov 27 2005Yes..as a writer She will always be remembered for tapestry, but as a brill building writter deserves to be in their. Along with the Neils. Barry & Cynthia, Jeff & Ellie. Call it the "Brill Building Writers" or somethng, but these guys shiould be in there.
by klsm54
Sat Oct 22 2005What? You have got to be kidding me! How can she not be in there. The whole place is a sham!
by fuzzyj
Fri Sep 23 2005One of the premiere female singer/songwriters of the last 40 years! In as a songwriter.....deserves to be in as a performer as well simply for the number of people who owned (and were influenced by!) TAPESTRY!