War on Iraq
Approval Rate: 25%
Reviews 50
by eschewobfuscat_ion
Wed Sep 24 2008It is probably one of THE most important issues of the day yet so many rate it in the mediocre range. Gosh, there are anti-war demonstrations in Washington, just like the liberal-dominated 1960's! Well, maybe not quite so many protestors but you'd never know it by the media coverage, you'd think these were bigger than the Vietnam protests! The fact is that the anti-war movement in the US is barely on life support but for the overblown media coverage of tiny events like Cindy Sheehan's inconsequential and incoherent demonstration against President Bush. Nobody cares except for a few left-wing zealots (most of whom actually ARE American journalists) who would protest ANY war (except one started by Bill Clinton) and ANYTHING George Bush has done. The shameful truth is that while they broadcast daily the body count of American Servicemen, no such body count was even recorded when Clinton went into Kosovo, in similar defiance of the United Nations. How quickly they forget. What sickens me i... Read more
by fitman
Wed Sep 24 2008It's past time to 'cut and run' (declare victory and withdraw).
by kelso94
Thu Aug 21 2008no one in or around iraq wants democracy.I think all bush wants is to take there.For some reason we are all ways friends with the dictators.If u google search a pic of Rummy and sudamm they are shaking hands.(rummy is our secratary of defense).
by chicagoman
Tue Apr 03 2007We have made the country worse off than before we came. Hundreads of thousands of needles deaths for nothing but oil. Two Thirds of the U.S. soldiers think this war has been mishandled and there is no end to it. There are so many different groups all fighting each other we are just another group fighting a never ending war. Even if we establish a democracy it will never work the people will revolt against it like they have been doing. We have screwed Iraq we are training there soliders so we can leave and let them fight the war we began. A huge mistake, we could be doing something useful in the world like helping darfur.
by genghisthehun
Tue Mar 27 2007This is the most pressing issue we have. We must declare victory and withdraw.
by rok100
Tue Mar 27 2007This video footage of the new UN Secretary General's visit to Baghdad tells you everything you need to know about Iraq. 1) Loud explosions nearby can make your suit pants smell funny. 2) It's friggin' hillarious when a fully-grown Korean man runs thru the Green Zone frantically screaming "Where my ruggage?! Where my air prane?! I go home now!" and 3) Kyra "Lies with Karl Rove" Phillips and the rest of the western TV newspublicans (Republicans disguised as news people) are now desperately trying to sell the war in Iraq as a roaring success. Studies have shown that you people are very likely to believe them, if they say it often enough and loudly enough. Those exact same studies have also shown that the FOX News viewers ALREADY believe that Baghdad is like a Jesusy cartoon happy-time funner version of Disneyland - but without all the crowds.You people never even knew about the anti-terrorism guy burning himself up directly in front of the White House, with hundreds of spectators and paid... Read more
by donovan
Tue Mar 27 2007As long as U.S. soldiers are being killed and injured, how can any American say this is not important?
by pugwash01
Fri Mar 23 2007I feel that it would be right for me to comment on this subject, as I have served in the Gulf alongside the US Military. When I was in the Gulf, there was undoubtedly weapons of mass destruction and I was and to a point still am agreeable with our presence there: But I feel our time there is past gone!!!!! Sadam is no longer in control and apart from the separatist, which really is the reason for prolonged military presence. I feel we should be departing and just monitoring from a distance! Too many lives have been lost on both sides of the allied force and it's about time our countries pulled our troops BACK! I have just finished watching many of the Tributes on "You Tube " and to be frank it made my heart sink. So many lives, Young and old have slipped away and families have suffered so badly. I'm very proud of our troops and they deserve so much respect for there obedience to their orders and their flag! My heart is disturbed that the UN or somebody has not actioned the troops to le... Read more
by djahuti
Mon Oct 23 2006Let's not ignore the hard lessons still being learned in the "War on Iraq".Let's not be distracted by new and very similar rhetoric about "threats" from other countries.Let's remember clearly the lies and distortions we are still paying for,and let's not allow more of out Troops to be put in harms way by the same swindlers behind the Iraq quagmire.Is the current situation the work of people who get their facts straight or level honestly with us about their reasons for waging war?Were our troops properly trained and equipped for the situation they were put in?Did innocent people need to die by the thousands to remove one minor despot?Aren't we already under a crushing debt?How many more will DIE thanks to a "leader" who REFUSES to clean up his own mess? No exit strategy.NO WMDS.No connection to BinLaden(not for Hussein,anyway).Like Roger Daltrey sang,I hope we "Don't Get Fooled Again".
by chalky
Fri May 05 2006i have been against this war from day 1. extremely pointless; people die nearly everyday. there isn't even an exit strategy. there are much bigger threats to our country, specifically our domestic problems. while i support our troops regardless, anyone who voted for that war has accountability and is responsible...and that goes for both sides such as losers like h.clinton, kerry, bush, frist and so on......
by zzzoom
Thu Feb 02 2006A very insignificant war, except to those brave Americans who are forced to be there, and to their families and friends who wish they could come home. Not important compared to issues much closer to home. 2 stars.
by decalod85
Sun Dec 04 2005Iraq was not a threat to the US. They were not involved in 9/11. "Bush and Co." invaded so that we could fight the terrorists abroad. We needed a front line that wasn't New York or LA. Unfortunately for them, Iraqis don't get to vote in American elections, or our war would have been held someplace else.
by miketou
Mon Nov 21 2005Unwinable.
by canadasucks
Fri Nov 18 2005"Quick! Invade another nation that had no ties to 9-11! Hurry! The American people are catching on!! Start picking on the Chinese! Do something!" The tighter you squeeze, the more it slips through your fingers. . .the mask is slipping off, kids. . .
by specialboothvi_cjr
Thu Dec 23 2004Must I point out that I agree with what up dog. It's possible we might be dead right now whithout the war on Iraq. We now know that they have weapons. Pulling out of Iraq before the weapons are found will make it much worse.
by abichara
Sun Oct 24 2004Our military lived up to the highest standards it set during the combat operations in Iraq during March and April of 2003--indeed we do have the greatest fighting force in the world today. We can still debate the basis of this war, the bottom line is that now we're there and we need set metrics as Don Rumsfeld would say, for success here. What do we define this as so we can in turn begin pulling out of there. We need an honest assessment of our actual strategic position there. The real battle we face today is for support of the Iraqi people and for the legitimacy of the regime that we hope will bring stability and freedom to the region. That is a goal that I'm certain we all share at this point. The question remains, how do we go about it? The presence of 135 thousand troops in Iraq along with the allegations of torture has really damaged our credibility with the people. The War on Terrorism hasn't been advanced at all by this cause. Iraqis also have had bad experiences with European o... Read more
by daccory
Fri Oct 01 2004It never ceases to amaze me just how gullible some people are. I think the media, run by the most powerful business corporations ever, might be the reason behind it. Rupert Murdoch, that most hateful of corporate beasts, roams the world, not with fact and objectivity but with opinion and rhetoric. This war was about Bush and his 'cabal' of advisors and about that alone. If only the invasion had been for altruistic reasons alone - to liberate the Iraqis from a despot- the whole world would have been in support. The fact that they weren't must surely tell the American people something. It is most certainly an issue that is of major importance to the US now and a completely new way of looking at it is in order.
by virilevagabond
Mon Aug 30 2004Whether one supports or does not support the U.S. intervention in Iraq, this issue is clearly a five star matter. I find it a bit odd that only few comments are dated relatively recently now that we have the benefit of hindsight (though that can be a trap into subjectivity). Anyway, the Iraqi War was and remains clearly divisive. Many have debated whether Iraq was an imminent threat; however, that question was largely academic in today's world of weapons of mass destruction and defense agreements (ie an imminent threat to an ally is an imminent threat to the U.S.). Many also confuse the ultimate question regarding WMDs. The question isn't whether we ultimately find WMDs; the question is whether it was reasonable to believe that Iraq had WMDs given what we knew and the intelligence available (even if some was conflicting), and if so, what was the proper course of action. Whether it was reasonable to believe that Iraq had or would obtain WMDs at the best opportunity isn't really a matte... Read more
by numbah16tdhaha
Tue Aug 17 2004I don't like to see anything about this. Having been in the Marines I hate watching the news anymore because there is a chance that my friends might show up as killed in action. But they know what they are doing and believe wholeheartedly in what they are doing, just like I do. Anybody who wants to downplay the importance and sacrifice should look on any of the multitude of sights that will show you the pictures of the fallen. Look closely, and if you want real heros, they are all there. People like Lcpl Blair of the United States Marines, a personal friend of mine who died in the initial invasion. Look at my friends face and tell me that this is not important. I dare you. UPDATE: I would bet that anybody who rates this unhelpful won't have the nut to go look my friend in the eyes. I don't have to name names. Everybody knows who you are. UPDATE TO THE UPDATE:A few people are pissed enough about this post to go and rate all my comments of late as unhelpful. If you are mad then I acheive... Read more
by joybuglev
Fri Mar 26 2004The way I see it, we went after Bin Laden after he did what he did on 9/11. I think Bush decided that since we were over there anyway, we may as well get Saddam too. So the next thing we hear is that Iraq has WMD and Saddam was in it with Bin Laden on the 9/11 attack. He declared war on Saddam because as he said on TV He's the one that tried to kill my daddy. Poor child. When no WMD's were found he decided we were there to free the Iraqi. I support our military, but Bush has used them to take WMD's into Iraq. If you notice, the only thing they have tried to protect over there is the oil fields.
by jaws298b
Thu Feb 19 2004It's been almost a year since Saddam Hussein was thrust from power by the U.S. and its allies. Now the big stink is where are the WMD's? They may have never existed. They may still be hidden somewhere. Who knows? Who cares? What we do know is that Hussein was trying to develop nuclear weapons and we didn't want to WAIT until he was an imminent threat before we took action. It would be too late by then. Many of you are saying that posession of WMD's was the reason for going to war. That may well be the case but remember - the documents siezed by the UN and allied intelligence stated that Hussein had WMD's so we know they existed on paper. Removing Hussein had to be done. Let's take a look at what has happened since then: On the downside there is still a resistance in Iraq trying to thwart our efforts to rebuild and stabilize the country. On the flip side Libya's president Muammar Qadaffi saw what happened to Hussein and decided to come clean with the U.S. on his nuclear we... Read more
by darthrater
Sat Dec 27 2003Oh, is there a war in Iraq? Saddam Hussein has been defeated and there is a new government. The war is over. It's nation building now.
by the_real_truth
Fri Nov 14 2003Evil men pursuing oil.
by holyman
Sat Aug 30 2003What a mess!
by sunnstars2003
Thu Aug 21 2003This should never have even started. G.W. only invaded because he had to finish what his father couldn't. Did it ever occur to people that it makes America seem like terrorists? Isn't the defintion of terrorism basically 'invading a country to inflict force'? No, I didn't take that defintion from a dictionary, but that's the basis. And Iraq hasn't even turned around yet. It's still laying in ruins with bombs still exploding and people are still dying. It's pathetic that people still support Bush after this whole affair.
by what_up_dog
Thu Jul 10 2003if bush didn't decide to go to war, millions of people in major cities might be dead cause of saddam. we live in a free country so that doesn't mean some guy should try to take over da world with weapons. i hope they nuke his brains out.
by redoedo
Sun May 18 2003This issue is so controversial- it is even so controversial in my mind that I cannot seem to make up my mind on this. While I initially had a pre-disposition of being unsupportive of the war, I now seem to agree with it more and more. However, I do not agree with the methods in which we are using to instill democracy in Iraq. We sent our boys over there to fight a war against a murderous tyrant who "possessed nuclear weapons" which he shockingly did not use even when he came-a-knocking on his door. I'd say when things get tense- that'd be when I'd use my nuclear and chemical weapons, wouldn't you. No, instead he runs off into exile. Makes a whole lot of sense to me. Meanwhile, the other two nations in the Axis of Evil who pose a greater threat (notably North Korea) know that they are next and are scrambling more than ever to defend themselves in the event of an American declaration of war on their nations. I really like how Bush was able to convince much of this country to support the ... Read more
by rebelyell1861
Tue May 13 2003It was very necassary and more than justified.
by tahnee18
Thu May 08 2003Terrorism sucks, so does war. Lets compare both of them; terrorism: loss of life, use of weapons, destruction of buildings. War:loss of life, use of weapons, destruction of buildings. The only difference is that one is legal.However, I have to give the President credit, getting rid of Saddam Hussein was a good reason, and the only legitimate reason for this war. Too bad we didn't do this back in 1991. It's too bad life was loss on both sides.
by president_x_d
Wed Apr 23 2003Bush is not invading a sovereign nation. He is removing a criminal from power. What the anti-war people need to remember is the fact that Saddam Hussein is a CRIMINAL, first and foremost. The US has every right to pursue its own self defense and to choose who their enemies are, without asking for approval from anyone, including the UN. The way I understand it, war on Iraq is OK but ONLY if the UN approves? This means that the anti-war folks are NOT opposed to war; they are opposed to the United States acting in their own self-interest. Sorry, but we live in an INDEPENDENT, FREE NATION and have every RIGHT to choose our own enemies. A hodge-podge of dictatorships, communists, socialists and various non-freedom loving nations (read: your UN) have NO moral right to dictate the actions of the US. The UN is a conglomeration of anti-freedom states with LIBYA in charge of their "human rights" commission! That ALONE should make any reasoned person question the UN's motives… the UN is comprised... Read more
by twinmom101
Fri Apr 18 2003I'm writing this in the aftermath of most of the war. Everyone around the world is glad that Saddam Hussein is gone, or if they have any humanity they should be. What I'm having a problem with now is how Iraq is being handled after the fall. It seems the safest place to be in Iraq right now is an oil field. Looters have ransacked museums, hospitals, government buildings and private homes with many civilian casualties and loss of property. Where was the military as all this was going on? Why were the oil fields secured within hours of obtaining them while humanitarian facilities were destroyed with little US intervention? The administration keeps saying over and over again that they are not there for the oil, but how can they explain these facts? Also, as someone with a degree in Ancient Civilizations, I was horrified to see the destruction of the Iraq museum. Those were priceless treasures, some almost 5,000 years old. What a tragic end. These artifacts were part of Iraq's c... Read more
by samson42284
Wed Apr 09 2003war is a scary thing. i have friends my age (19) fighting over ther right now. this thing could escalate into something bigger but i hope not. but never the less our troops are over there right now FIGHTING. and i hope they win and come home safely. i just want this thing to be over with.
by davcar
Thu Apr 03 2003For all you anti-war idiots, don't forget what happened on 9/11, 3000 Americans tragically lost their lives for no reason, I for one am not waiting for Saddom or any other anti-american country to try something on our soil. Lets get him and lets get him now.
by victoryman
Tue Apr 01 2003Thank God for an administration with enough love for Freedom, God and Country to step up, against world opinion, and do the RIGHT thing. The people of Iraq have suffered long enough under the Sadam's demonic tactics. We should have put Sadam out in '91. Well, as my mother used to say: "better late than than never". It's time to pray for our leaders (wisdom), our troups (safety) and the innocent victims of Iraq (freedom at last. As for the financial cost... I'm sure the Iraqis will gladly foot the bill for all of this... (Lord knows they have the oil)... when they FINALLY TASTE FREEDOM... that is, of course, if we don't bow our knees to political preasure and correctness.
by myles65b
Mon Mar 31 2003Silly, silly people. Here's the real story: There is a snot load of oil under a country that happens to be called Iraq. The fact that it is called Iraq is irrelevent. It is full of Arabic people who call themselves Iraqis. This too is irrelevent. They have a brutal despot controlling their lives called Saddam Hussein. This, not surprisingly, is also irrelevent. The only thing relevent is the oil and the fact that our nasty dicator preferred to sell it to European oligarchs, rather than American. Yes kids, this is an inter-oligarchical conflict fought between American oil concerns and European oil concerns. They fight the war using, as proxies, nation states and the lives of many young people of those countries. The men and women who comprise these oligarchies are not really human in the way most of us understand. They are rich, powerful and utterly callous. It is for them, not the nation, that the soldiers fight and for them that so many people will be killed and maimed in this war.
by filly1776
Wed Mar 26 2003The hypocrisy of Liberals really shines through on this subject, as evidenced by many of the opinions on this page. Isn't liberalism about ALTRUISM??? That has been the rallying cry for years. That is why we as a nation are stuck with bloated, dead-end programs like social security, Medicare, and welfare. Now don't get me wrong, I am all for helping people in need, but then again, that could be one reason to go to war with Iraq, right? Was it not just the other day that a group of human shields left the country because they realized that Saddam is truly evil incarnate, putting people through plastic shredders, feet first, to ensure that they could feel the pain and the bystanders could hear their screams. Saddam's connection to terrorism is not nearly as ambiguous as liberals would have people believe. Read Laurie Mylroie's book, "Study of Revenge, - Saddam Hussein's Unfinished War Against America" and tell me if the man does not fund terrorism against the U.S. I hear the cries... Read more
by mofengland
Wed Mar 26 2003sorry guys, you think going to war with iraq has just cost you your alliance with the french? believe me, in pretty much every country people are turning against america. britain is your closest ally, right? your just lucky blair is in charge, because he must be the only one left in the whole country who supports america. everyone else here is against virtually all of americas greedy, ignorant policies. we brits, all europeans and the rest of the world now realise just why bush blocked the international criminal court unless it granted all american citizens automatic immunity from being tried for any crime, because the entire american military and government would be imprisoned. illegal invasions, guantanamo bay... while we're on the subject of guantanamo bay: did anyone else hear bush and rumsfeld complaining that iraq was breaking the geneva convention? they must be joking, eh? the iraqis showed a little bit of them on camera, what does th US gov. do to their captives in guantanamo b... Read more
by basshawg
Mon Mar 24 2003Saddam is mentally unstable and an obvious threat to world peace. It's time he was terminated.
by homelesspoet
Mon Mar 24 2003This is a much needed war. Its about time we done something with Saddam and as far as the anti-war protesters are concerned, I think some are probably sincere and dont support war, but I think most of them think like this, they probably are thinking " Oh we're at war hey we should protest like you know we could be like John lennon huh that would be cool" Its this mentality that has undermined the patriotism in our country. But I back Bush 100 percent, I am a republican and I still believe in WAR. Thats right, I said it!
by tearpe26
Mon Mar 24 2003War is not a solution for anything. Bush is in it for personal reasons and dragging the rest of us with him. I say "Not in my name!" Peace
by tvmoviemusicfr_ek
Sun Mar 23 2003I fully support the war!!! Go Bush!!
by kamylienne
Sun Mar 23 2003I personally would have liked to have seen this war averted, but, since the war has already begun, I think the most important thing to do is hope that this war is brief, so as not to drag more and more people in; hope that our loved ones overseas come home unharmed; hope that those who are innocent are out of harm's way, in ALL countries; hope that our loved ones here at home stay safe. I know there will be causualties, but we should hope that these are kept to a minimum, and hope that they do not include young children and those who have nothing to do with this war. Whether we believe in this war or not, at this time I think it is more important to think of what matters most: the people. (This is addition to my original statement--for those of you who disagreed with this statement and apparently think that our people are expendable: What, are you people sick or something? Do you not know anyone over there? Are you that bloodthirsty that you don't think that our loved ones and ne... Read more
by reenyf4b
Sun Mar 23 2003We are now at war and it is a horrible thing. We already have casualties, POW'S and we have only been fighting for a week. I hope this war ends soon but I fear it will last a lot longer than I wish and that the cost will have outweighed the risks the U.S. took greatly. I have a cousin in Iraq now and I fear and pray for him and the rest of our troops, I pray for the families that have lost loved ones in Iraq. I do not support this war and I do not support Bush, but I do support our troops and pray that they make it through this thing alive. Hopefully this will be the last war this country experiences for a long time.
by misspackrat4je_sus
Sun Mar 23 2003I hate war every bit as much as the next person. It is not pretty. However, there is a time for it, and now is the time. My constant thoughts and prayers are for the troops who are overseas, for the people who have already lost loved ones, and for President George W. Bush, whose job I wouldn't take for anything in the world. There has got to be something done with Saddam Hussein once and for all, and we cannot quit too soon. We will succeed if we stand united and don't give up. God bless America!
by brenda_hight
Sun Mar 23 2003I think we are doing the right thing on the war with Iraq. Hussein has to leave. Our protestors, are against fighting, but, yet they are fighting themselves on the streets of New York. Have they forgotton about 9/11. Obviouly, the pain, has been great in our country. We must support our troops, that are fighting for freedom.
by erictko
Sat Mar 22 2003I give it 10 stars. I give my president 10 stars. Saddam needs to be stopped. Hopefully he is. The people of Iraq, the innocents, need to be liberated. And most want to. That was graphically illustrated as one of our soldiers was tearing down a poster of Saddam and a citizen of Iraq was hitting the terrorist dictator's face on the poster with his shoe. I have a friend who is a 20 year old female who currently serves on an aircraft carrier. She and the vast majority of the military want to put a stop to his terrorism. He has gassed and killed his own people but yet today I had to watch in disgust as our own people protested this war. I am not pro-war. I am anti-Saddam. I am anti-Bin Laden and all their ilk. And I just watched in disgust as it's been learned that one of our own threw 2 hand grenades into the tents of his command. Well I have said enough but I am totally disgusted.
by niehausapprais_er
Sat Mar 22 2003Wish I had a program to insert 15 or 20 more stars here. I've been waiting for this for years, and the honor, conduct, bravery and efficiency of the CAPITALIST United States military is astounding. PROTESTERS and other assorted leftie second-handers? I can't wait to see them scratch their heads when the Iraqi people smile, wave and throw flowers at our boys in gratitude for their freedom from the Butcher. Most of these protesters are simply brainwashed products of the tenured, collectivist, socialist university academics who sadly rule our "higher learning" <cough> institutions, teaching the young mind about victimhood in the guise of "diversity." But that's another topic.... ON TO BAGHDAD !!!
by aryglesock
Sat Mar 22 2003Preemptive war is unethical and sets a terrible standard for the rest of the world. Americans are so confused now, half of them think that Iraq had something to do with 9/11. This is a war for oil and for control in the middle east.
by pogonogo
Sat Mar 22 2003I am for freedom for the entire world, not just our small corner of it. It is far past time, ladies and gentlemen, to remove the leftist anti-American hold on our country. The same old voices saying: AMERICA IS ALWAYS WRONG, AMERICA IS TERRIBLE AND OPPRESSIVE TO OTHER NATIONS, AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY IS IMPERIALIST, ETC... The far left has been aiding, abetting, and given comfort to our nation's enemies for decades. We, as a nation, should start protesting in the streets. Right now I see protests organized against Mr. Bush, but unbelievably, none against Mr. Sadaam Hussein! I have heard the propaganda speeches of Mr Hussein, and the rhetoric of the left, and cannot tell them apart. You see, they both hate this country equally. The "Give peace a chance" people are just as dangerous. They will never understand that the world is a dangerous place, or that what gives them the freedom to make their speeches and sing "Where have all the flower's gone" is because some real brave men p... Read more
by patche5c
Sat Mar 22 2003what can i say, i am 23 and the world in not the same place that my olds grew up in but i can tell you what i learnt from history is that the world sat back and did #$#@!! all in europe before ww2 and look what happened. if you stick your head in the sand and do nothing some one will come along and kick you in the arse. Who will protect the world art studenst greens, and peace protesters. i would go live on mars if that was the case. this is not a war my generation has picked, but i feel that it is one that will get finished for better or worst.